Campaigners protest against boardwalk plan for Plymouth's Sutton Harbour
A MULTI-MILLION pound project to redevelop Plymouth's historic harbour has been branded a "profiteering exercise" that would destroy the heritage of the area.
Sutton Harbour Holdings' (SHH) plan to build a boardwalk linking Guys Quay and Vauxhall Quay, featuring new restaurants and shops, has been rejected by dozens of local residents and business owners.
-

Campaigners protest against boardwalk plan for Plymouth's Sutton Harbour
The Action Group for Sutton Harbour (AGSH), which was formed to fight a previous application in 2006, has raised a number of "serious concerns" about the proposals.
SHH claims the project would boost visitor numbers and create jobs, but the campaigners have four main areas of concern - heritage and conservation; sustainability; environmental impact; and noise and antisocial behaviour.
Comprising Lounge,Kitchen,Dining Room,Utility Room,2nd,3rd & 4th Bedrooms,Master Bedroom With En-Suite,Bathroom,Gardens,Garage & Driveway.CT Band E.EPC Band D.Av.12/07/13 For 6 Mths & Ongoing.
Terms: ***NB: Please be advised that charges are applicable per application and subject to contract. No additional charges are required for the Tenancy Agreement or Inventory unless stated otherwise.***
Contact: 01752 421825
Valid until: Thursday, August 01 2013
Chairman Ben Sanders said: "We think this is a profiteering exercise and would be very detrimental should it be approved."
Mr Sanders has written to Plymouth City Council's planning department, urging councillors to take the group's points on board.
He said: "The proposal neither enhances, complements or respects the surrounding areas and buildings.
"It is commonly acknowledged that an increasing number of business premises have become vacant in the past year.
"With that in mind, it is strongly felt that a planning application to build further restaurants and takeaway establishments cannot be sustainable, particularly given the current financial climate."
Mr Sanders claims the land beneath the harbour is contaminated, and says the application would lead to a rise in "late-night revellers".
He said: "Vauxhall Quay and North Quay is a predominantly residential area and the proposed development could indeed exacerbate the levels of crime and antisocial behaviour in the area."
Local resident Ray Bralsford said: "It's a question of what is in keeping with the historical nature of the area. That was the thing that got the original plan thrown out in the first place, there was such an outcry from people who thought the idea of filling in a bit of the harbour for commercial development was appalling, and I think they would be equally appalled by this.
"Nobody who lives here has been consulted. The people who live right here, within 20ft of where it's going to be developed, were not consulted at all.
"Sutton Harbour are property developers. This has got much more to do with property development than enhancing the harbour."
Dave Cuthbert, chairman of the Plymouth Fisherman's Association, said the fishing community is concerned about loss of space to tie up and dry boats.
"They don't speak to us, there's no consultation, it's a fait accompli as far as we are concerned," he said.
"The fishing community has contributed a huge amount to Sutton Harbour, we feel we are being ignored. We never get consulted about anything.
"I don't think anybody is against them improving the harbour, but they are destroying its heritage."
RESPONSE
CHIEF Executive of Sutton Harbour Holdings Jason Schofield said: "We are aware that our proposals have prompted some concerns, but we strongly believe that the boardwalk would make a hugely positive contribution to Plymouth's waterfront.
"It would act as a catalyst for the £75 million plan to transform Sutton Harbour into a national destination, which we launched to wide support last year and would also continue the harbour's evolution which has taken place over many centuries.
"We are trying to diversify and boost the city's visitor economy while creating much better pedestrian links to enable people to explore and appreciate the whole harbour as a major destination in the South West region.
"This part of Plymouth is rightly renowned for its maritime heritage and we have been careful to design a scheme which we believe respects and celebrates that heritage.
"The boardwalk would be a free-standing timber structure with light weight timber-clad buildings on top and set apart from the historic quay wall, and is designed to reconnect people with the waterfront, instead of being forced away from it which is currently the case.
"We are confident in our job projection figures, which are based on industry norms, and know that this site would be attractive to family-friendly operators, which is our target market. We are already close to reaching an outline agreement with a couple of quality national restaurant operators that would be new to Plymouth, subject to planning permission.
"We have no plans to in-fill this part of the harbour and the piles that would support the boardwalk would be subject to a licence from the Marine Management Organisation. Other concerns that have been expressed, such as the handling of trade waste and opening hours, would be dealt with as planning conditions attached to any consent.
"We believe that the many economic and social benefits of the boardwalk fit well with Plymouth's aspiration as 'Britain's Ocean City' and as custodians of Sutton Harbour we want to celebrate our world class waterfront."




25 Comments
View all
by yaman
Monday, March 11 2013, 7:47AM
“Bunch of bored old farts, who would have thought!”
by MissAnthrope
Sunday, March 10 2013, 10:14PM
“Rates were abolished in 1989 in Scotland and 1990 in England and Wales NTL, being replaced by the 'Poll Tax', and subsequently the Council Tax. For those interested parties who have emerged into the current decade, the Sutton Harbour Action Group is to hold an emergency meeting in the Dolphin tomorrow at 8pm where we plan to discuss which of our brothers (or sisters) has the guts to paint 'SHH EUNT DOMUS' on the walls of the Citadel. New members welcome.”
by notolisbon
Sunday, March 10 2013, 9:32PM
“@Waltersmith
I'm a little bit peed with comparing my old Robin Reliant to this ramshackle affair.
And I didn't depend on stealing the hard-earned cash of the poor put-upon rate payer to buy it.
I feel a "whingers and wisecrackers" comment coming on - she'lL be here in a minute (or is it HE)”
by Waltersmith
Sunday, March 10 2013, 9:19PM
“@emsee
I bet you think the staples building is cool as well.
This development is c**p and of reliant robin standard”
by emsee
Sunday, March 10 2013, 1:39PM
“After actually looking at the plans (http://tinyurl.com/cu6gpug), I honestly can't see what the fuss is about.
The development will be tiny, and I personally think it will be an asset to our waterfront.”
by timplymouth
Sunday, March 10 2013, 9:02AM
“I wouldn't take anything MissAnthrope says literally. She was making the point that it is hypocritical of business owners to complain that another business wants to make money.”
by pilgrimpete
Sunday, March 10 2013, 8:54AM
“MissAnthrope. Why should businesses become non-profit making charities, is that what you want on The Barbican, charity shops, no private enterprise. SHH are only interested in themselves and not Plymouth, The Barbican doesn't need more drinking/eating places, that's what the new build will mainly contain, that wont help the small businesses away from the main area to survive, they will suffer the same fate as the bottom end of the city.”
by pilgrimpete
Sunday, March 10 2013, 8:53AM
“MissAnthrope. Why should businesses become non-profit making charities, is that what you want on The Barbican, charity shops, no private enterprise. SHH are only interested in themselves and not Plymouth, The Barbican doesn't need more drinking/eating places, that's what the new build will mainly contain, that wont help the small businesses away from the main area to survive, they will suffer the same fate as the bottom end of the city.”
by pilgrimpete
Sunday, March 10 2013, 8:47AM
“MissAnthrope. Why should businesses become non-profit making charities, is that what you want on The Barbican, charity shops, no private enterprise. SHH are only interested in themselves and not Plymouth, The Barbican doesn't need more drinking/eating places, that's what the new build will mainly contain, that wont help the small businesses away from the main area to survive, they will suffer the same fate as the bottom end of the city.”
by MissAnthrope
Sunday, March 10 2013, 8:15AM
“As one of the founders of the Sutton Harbour Action Group I'd like to remind the Action Group for Sutton Harbour that you are SPLITTERS! If existing business owners on the Barbican are worried that this is all about profit, why don't they set an example and lower their prices? They could become non-profit making charities and that would be more likely to attract customers.”