Christopher and Charlotte Sheldon jailed for assault and neglect of their baby in Plymouth
A MOTHER and father have each been jailed for three years for repeatedly beating their baby, breaking his bones and leaving him covered in bruises.
Christopher and Charlotte Sheldon assaulted their defenceless son Ethan at least three times in the first four months of his life, Plymouth Crown Court heard.
-

Christopher and Charlotte Sheldon jailed for assault and neglect of their baby in Plymouth
They also failed in their duty as parents to seek medical attention for his injuries.
He suffered three broken ribs, a fractured collarbone, a fractured ankle and a broken big toe. Ethan also had 20 bruises over his body – which doctors concluded could not have been caused accidentally.
A leading children's charity said after the case that Ethan had "suffered a horrific catalogue of abuse".
Sarah Allum, team manager at The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) Plymouth, said: "Ethan Sheldon, a defenceless child, suffered at the hands of the people who should have been giving him love, care and protection – his parents."
Christopher, aged 32, of Bridgetown, Totnes, and Charlotte Sheldon, aged 24, of Sefton Avenue, Lipson, had denied two counts of child cruelty in the months after Ethan was born.
But they were found guilty after a two-week trial last month.
The jury was told Ethan was repeatedly struck with a long thin implement such as a piece of cutlery or a length of flex and squeezed so hard that his ribs broke.
The injuries, which happened on at least three occasions, were only uncovered after a routine call by a health visitor to the family home in October 2010, when Ethan was four months old.
Call centre worker Christopher and shop assistant Charlotte ended up blaming each other.
Judge Paul Darlow said the jury had convicted them of causing the injuries and for not seeking the medical attention the "injuries clearly merited".
He added: "The evidence put before the jury showed that during the first four months of his life he was subjected to clear and obvious violence. Various parts of his body were subjected to varied and serious acts of violence over a short period of time."
Judge Darlow added that before, during and after the discovery of the injuries they showed more concern for their own relationship rather than for Ethan – "the most helpless of the three of you".
He said: "I do not suggest for a moment that the injuries were the result of sadism or any wish to harm Ethan.
"You are both relatively young and have been punished to a certain extent by the loss of Ethan."
He said that the pair would pose a risk to children upon their release and said the specialist agencies would have to be involved in the future.
Malcolm Clark, for Christopher Sheldon, said he had suffered from mental illness and depression. He said he would find it harder to cope than others in prison.
Mr Clark added that he had never exhibited violent behaviour towards children before.
He said: "For the rest of his life there will be someone in the background making sure checks are in place if he has any unsupervised contact with children."
Nick Lewin, for Charlotte Sheldon, said that Ethan would have no long-term ill effects from his injuries. He added, save for the shoulder blade, he would have been in "very little pain and discomfort".
Mr Lewin said any acts against Ethan were "spontaneous" and said she had a lot of responsibility at the time as her husband tackled depression.
Mrs Allum said after the case: "This sentence is midway between the two to five year sentencing guidelines so it could have been higher. But we are pleased the judge acknowledged that agencies should be involved with the couple following their release on licence.
"The ordeal Ethan was subjected to highlights the vulnerability of children under the age of one who are eight times more likely to be killed than children in other age groups.
"Many infants do not survive such a horrific catalogue of abuse."




32 Comments
View all
by jaynenothappy
Tuesday, March 12 2013, 7:32AM
“3 yrs thats it, how do the justice work, confused dotty com, shouldd of had life, GOD DO REPAY,,FACT”
by NLAxx
Monday, March 11 2013, 7:51PM
“Vile people shud be given the death penalty!! People like you make my skin crawl!”
by klscriviner
Sunday, March 10 2013, 9:26PM
“Why don't all of u have some respect and quit with the harsh comments. I am sure all of you have your reasons but if the parents saw what all of you write on here they would be disgusted with all of your attitudes towards their son.”
by tarquil88
Saturday, March 09 2013, 9:45PM
“So disappointed at the short sentence, it's not like it was a couple of bruises. They broke his bones. I'm pleased they were both found guilty. Both are a pair of idiots and clearly not capable of looking after any children. Why aren't we able to force sterilisation so people like this stop breeding. I hope Ethan is getting to find out what love and care actually is. He's best off not knowing them and being allowed to enjoy a normal family life until he's old enough to understand what horrors they put him through, and make his own decision if he wants those awful people in his life. If Ethan ever looked not in pain, its because he knew crying was pointless, it wouldn't get him any love, care, or attention. Also they think it would only have been his shoulder that hurt. Well that's just pure agony for him every single time he was picked up, moved around, or was dressed. Yeah sure that's nothing for a baby who cant say don't touch me there it hurts! I'd like to see Nick Lewin with those injuries and see if he still thinks it'll be nearly painless.”
by eye4aneye1
Saturday, March 09 2013, 3:58PM
“sterilise the pair of them!!”
by devongirl1
Saturday, March 09 2013, 3:55PM
“What did judge Darlow mean when he said that he did not suggest for a moment that the injuries were as a result of sadism or of a wish to harm Ethan. Of course they meant to harm him, they would not have done it otherwise. And then not to get medical attention for him is so cruel. They blamed each other because they probably thought that way it could not be proved which of them was the perpetrator. Well they were obviously both perpetrators by their actions. Judge Darlow both excused them by saying they were 'relatively young', and that he was suffering from depression and she found it hard to cope. He was 32 and she was 24!! We are not talking about immature teenagers here. Also as for the depression etc. there is lots of help out there. Thank goodness for the health visitor acting so promptly, if this abuse had continued it could have been 'Baby P' all over again. Her solicitor said that Ethan would have been in 'very little pain and discomfort' and that he would suffer no long term effects. How on earth could this man know this? Shame on you Judge Darlow for passing such a short sentence.”
by gembet
Saturday, March 09 2013, 2:20PM
“Not enough sentence really, in my opinion, a young child has been scarred for life, and the so called parents get 3 years, inside they will meet there demons .”
by Grunger
Saturday, March 09 2013, 1:05PM
“I'm sorry theparcel, but I can't see why society should shoulder any blame for these evil people. They are responsible for their own evil acts. Excuses are made by do-gooders for this type of sadistic animal all to often.”
by Grunger
Saturday, March 09 2013, 10:25AM
“British justice fails again and this evil pair will be on the streets again in no time.
Hopefully they might meet some real justice from their fellow inmates and feel similar pain to that they inflicted onto their child”
by dog_lover
Saturday, March 09 2013, 7:24AM
“whats with all the negative scoring against legitimate comments.... looks like the friends and family of these scum bags were out in force as soon as this story was published!!!”