City leader says no to Devon super council plan
PLYMOUTH City Council leader Vivien Pengelly has called for
people to reject the idea of a unitary 'super council' for
Devon.
The Tory councillor wants residents in Plymouth and South
West Devon to make representations against the proposal during
the Boundary Committee's consultation.
And she called for Plymouth's proposal – to extend its
boundaries and take in Tavistock, Ivybridge, Sherford and
Wembury – to be reconsidered by the Boundary Committee.
She said the committee's “hands were tied” over considering
changes to Plymouth, because of the remit set by the
Government.
She said: “It is clearly a nonsense to exclude Plymouth from
such an important decision.”
Meanwhile, South West Devon MP Gary Streeter is anxious to
learn how such a huge authority, run from Exeter, can represent
people in rural towns and villages in his constituency.
The Boundary Committee has proposed not to change the local
government boundaries of Plymouth and Torbay, but to create a
super unitary authority for the rest of Devon.
However, it will look again at whether there should be a
fourth authority, to cover Exeter and Exmouth.
Cllr Pengelly said she was “extremely disappointed” at the
super council proposal, which would mean the South Hams and
West Devon councils disappearing and councillors representing
much larger wards.
She said: “We believe the proposed super unitary authority
is wrong for the county, and for the districts and parishes in
South West Devon that were included in our proposals.
“It means these areas will be governed by a remote and
highly bureaucratic council based in Exeter and will be
competing for resources and attention against more than 400
other parishes.
“The proposals we put forward would have given communities
in South West Devon a greater say in the delivery of
services.”
Mr Streeter stressed that “most people in rural area were
against” the expanded Plymouth idea, but nevertheless wanted
more details of how a super council run from Exeter would
ensure “local communities' voices are still heard”.
“It's making government more remote,” he said.
South Hams and West Devon District Councils were also
disappointed.
They had called for a unitary authority which encompasses
both districts, and part of Dartmoor.
Both authorities fear the proposed system will result in
ward sizes increasing from about 2,500 people to more than
8,000.
West Devon Borough Council leader Cllr James McInnes said an
Exeter-run authority could be “too big and unwieldy”.
He doubted it would bring council tax savings for voters,
saying only central government would benefit.
“Our task is to make sure the proposals are thoroughly
researched,” he said.
Cllr John Tucker, leader of South Hams District Council,
said it was “essential” people have their say on the
proposals.
He said: “We have got to work through the issues and come
out with a way forward”.
Cllr Tucker is concerned jobs could be lost, and said 400
posts have gone as Cornwall moves to a unitary system.
“It's the top tier of management that will be reduced,” he
predicted.
South Hams District Councillor Keith Baldry added: “It's too
early to say how many jobs would go, but people may have to
relocate.”
Max Caller, Boundary Committee chairman, said: “These
proposals have the potential to offer people in Devon stronger
local government capable of providing better and more efficient
services.
“Your responses to the draft proposal will inform the advice
we give (the Secretary of State for Communities and Local
Government) so tell us what you think. More importantly, tell
us why you think that.”
The consultation period runs until September 26. The
Boundary Committee will then consider responses before making
recommendations to the Secretary of State for Communities and
Local Government by December 31.
The Government is expected to announce its decision by next
February .
Responses to the draft proposal can be made by filling in a
form at www.boundarycommittee.org.uk or writing to: Review
Manager, (Devon Review), the Boundary Committee for England,
Trevelyan House, Great Peter Street, London SW1P 2HW.










13 Comments
View all
by PHILIP, cornwall
Thursday, July 10 2008, 6:38PM
“we in cornwall had a poll taken to see if we would want the larger council to be formed. It was voted against by over 90% but guess what, it came in.”
by Suzannah, Stoke
Tuesday, July 08 2008, 10:29PM
“Lee Jameson - why should Plymouth politics concern you - don't you have enough to worry about with Boris Johnson being the new Mayor of London?”
by lenny, saltash
Tuesday, July 08 2008, 5:57PM
“Why is it that i have a picture in my head of the good folk of south hams and tavistock etc starting to build barricades and getting the molotov cocktails ready ?”
by ian, Plymouth
Tuesday, July 08 2008, 4:22PM
“I hope that Mrs Pengelly gets the same sort of response to her call for help as we get from them - None at all. Plymouth City Council should sort its self out before taking on more responsibility - I mean look at the Civic centre looks like its occupied and maintained by travellers not a Council.”
by lenny, saltash
Tuesday, July 08 2008, 4:13PM
“They should concentrate on getting things right in Plymouth first before they want to take over half of Devon .”
by Ian, Ivybridge
Tuesday, July 08 2008, 4:03PM
“Doesnt matter what the outcome is, There is one certainty local government will continue to bleed us dry with whopping council taxes and local stealth taxes like parking etc.”
by Brian, 43miles from Exeter
Tuesday, July 08 2008, 2:14PM
“Ken Saltash The road improvements from the end of the Embankment eastwards to Marsh Mills were carried out in the 1970 s ! perhaps you could check this saying this I will agree the closer to Exeter in the 1970s the more chance of better road system ! I know this as at the time I visited these roadworks sites as part of a roadwork course I was on at Torquay college.”
by M, Plymouth
Tuesday, July 08 2008, 1:13PM
“What is the point in the councils anyway, they have no contact with the real government and end up just hemorrhaging money and achieving nothing except for empty gestures, i mean look at the hoe, brand shiny new speed humps, on roads that are in such poor state you can barely get from one end to the other without dropping into a pot hole.
What is the point! i think we should scrap the current councils all together and get a system that actually works, and communicates with the government put in place.”
by solly, sollytash
Tuesday, July 08 2008, 12:25PM
“Ken , totally agree with you . My comment below yours was meant to be sarcastic.”
by Ken, Saltash Passage
Tuesday, July 08 2008, 11:23AM
“I remember when Exeter ran our affairs before in the 1970's we were the highest contributor in money being the largest City this side of Bristol and where did all our money get spent, yes you guessed it in Exeter, look at all those ring roads into Exeter City Centre and the M5 who paid for all that the few souls in Exeter didnt the mugs in Plymouth did and at what cost? Well I will tell you all the road building schemes drawn up for Plymouth NEVER Happened and when Plymouth got its powers back and became unitary again all the money had been spent, that is why those houses in Alma Rd lay blighted for years a flyover was suppose to be built there, also the Embankment was supposed to be upgraded and so was the A38 none of it happened no because Exeter spent all our money in Exeter, I dont often agree with Viv Pengelly but on this one I am 100% in agreement Never again must Exeter run our affairs never as for you lot you dont know what you are talking about on this i would re-elect her”