Concern over homes for the military

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Profile image for This is Cornwall

This is Cornwall

RENEWED concerns have been sparked over the condition of military housing in Plymouth amid evidence of widespread dissatisfaction among service families.

A parliamentary report indicates one in three armed forces households in the city think the condition of their homes is 'poor', while nearly a quarter say they are badly maintained.

And more than a third of the families surveyed by the National Audit Office said that the accommodation provided for them by the Ministry of Defence had not been properly cleaned before they moved in.

Plymouth contains much of the region's military accommodation because of its close ties to the armed forces.

Poor quality accommodation has been one of the continuing criticisms levelled at the Government, and is used to back up claims of it breaching its duty of care to troops, known as the military covenant.

The former Army head, Gen Sir Mike Jackson, has previously said some forces accommodation was "frankly shaming".

The Public Accounts Committee also said that many of the 42,000 families using service accommodation have little or no idea what their new home will be like when they move, and called for them to be provided with estate agent-style details, including photos and floor-plans.

And they called on the MoD to cut the proportion of its 50,000 properties in the UK which are standing empty – currently running at 17 per cent, well above the official target of 10 per cent.

Every percentage point cut in empty homes could save the MoD £2 million, said the cross-party group of MPs.

Military accommodation is ranked according to condition where one is the best and four the worst.

While 90 per cent is graded in the top two categories, meeting the Government's decent homes standard, the MPs' report shows that the proportion in the top grade fell from 57 per cent to 35 per cent between 2008 and 2009, while the second tier grew from 37 per cent to 59 per cent.

Committee chairman Edward Leigh said: "The standard of accommodation for the families of our servicemen and women is of continuing concern to this committee."

Over the summer, the Government announced military housing in Plymouth would undergo a makeover as part of a £3 billion improvement programme.

Targets were unveiled to bring homes for military personnel and their families in the city up to scratch.

Over the next decade the Ministry of Defence plans to spend more than £3 billion on new, upgraded and improved accommodation for members of the armed forces, including those living in Plymouth.

By 2020, defence chiefs aim to have all service families living in the highest standard of housing.

14
Tweet this article
Report

14 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Sean, Plymouth

    Thursday, October 22 2009, 11:33AM

    “Martine, if you bothered to read Rob's comment you'd see what he was talking about when he mentioned racism. Try reading MG's comment where it says, "GOD, THEY WANT EVERYTHING." "THEY" being the armed forces. As Rob quite rightly points out, if someone had called one of the ethnic minority groups "THEM" or "THEY" there would be public outcry, but as MG was just talking about the British Armed Forces, then that makes such comments ok. As I see it, the one with the "big, fat chip" on their shoulder, and showing agression is you, Martine. Maybe you should learn to read or learn to keep your mouth shut when commenting on something you obviously know nothing about. Why don't you go back to "hugging trees" or sweeping the streets? Something you should be very good at..... (And "Yes!" I am a serving member of the armed forces!)”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by martine, Plmyouth

    Wednesday, October 21 2009, 11:42AM

    “Rob i truly dont think you read my comment at all. I agree if places are in such bad condition that people should complain. Have a look again. Yep i did write that!! What the hell are you going on about racist stuff for!!??? People are allowed to have very strong views of the services. I could not care less if yopu were in the services or not just as you dont know if i was. I find you to be aggressive and with a great big fat chip on your shoulder. Maybe learn to control your temper. Did the services make you that way or were you already like that. Go and get a min wage job and dont moan unless of course you wanna join up. That is what you said wasnt it!!??”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Rob, Plymouth

    Wednesday, October 21 2009, 7:33AM

    “My Martine, ain't we clever? The standard of some defence housing is way below that of ordinary council houses. Forces tennants do not get to live in these houses for free, they do pay rent, council tax, water rates, utility bills etc. If you were renting sub-standard accomodation, would you not "moan" to your landlord and ask them to sort it out? I think you would...
    To someone that is used to living "in the field", in holes in the ground, or in a metal box for 7/8 months, the standard of accomodation may not seem too bad, but as it is the family of the service member, Wife/Husband/Children, that live in the house 24/7, why should they live in sub-standard conditions? Also Martine, I did not say people that earn minimum wage do not work hard. What I did say was that if you are on minimum wage and don't like it, do something about it rather than moan about others that earn more than you. Also M.G's comment "My God they want everything" just about sums up his/her mentality and, unfortunately, that of around 90% of the British population. If MG had said that about one of the "ethnic minority" groups, you would all be up in arms shouting "Racist" and the such, but as he/she was only commenting on the British Armed Forces, then no-one cares. And you accuse me of "double standards" Martine.. Enough said I think...”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Cleo, plymouth

    Tuesday, October 20 2009, 11:32PM

    “J.J i realise it must be lonely if a partner or family memeber is in the services but it was not the army that gave us freedom of speech. Sadly we need an army to serve and protect but freedom of speech is not where that came from. It comes from people also fighting wars within society.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Martine, plymouth

    Tuesday, October 20 2009, 11:28PM

    “Rob. Although M.g may have a few comments incorrect, they are correct in saying what makes them any different. You need a spine to join!!?? What on earth has that got to do with anything. So people are allowed to moan about poor conditions of houses but M.G is not allowed to complain about min wage. Double standards i think!! Its the choice of the person to join the army. Total choice. Its not like it used to be where you were forced to join. Its a choice. By all means complain if houses are really that poor but so are lots of houses that people move into that are not in the army and have to spend their own money to make it better. Seems to me a lot of people in the services get lots of money, oh and Rob for your information just because someone earns minimum wage does not mean they are not working hard. Seems to me that your the moron!!”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by jj, Plymouth

    Tuesday, October 20 2009, 8:25PM

    “Would love to buy, but we move around too much, kids too. Still not a real home, so far away from family and friends. Can get lonely when they are away for 7/8 months of the year. Know I may not even be in a position to have the freedom of speech to comment if we didn't make our sacrifices. Good job some see it as a "calling" rather than a choice!”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by karen, plymouth

    Tuesday, October 20 2009, 7:34PM

    “It's not about being snooty Andy, it's about some of houses belonging to DHE being below most peoples living standards, and in poor repair. As I said before on leaving an MOD you have a march out and they will give you a list of corrections you must complete or pay fines. It's the duty of the tenants to keep the house tidy and presentable, but it's the housing assosiation's duty to maintain these properties correctly.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by andy cornwall, cornwall

    Tuesday, October 20 2009, 5:13PM

    “These people choose to join up so why should they have the right to get snooty about the housing provided to them....a lot of people aren't even lucky enough to have there own home....dont be so selfish”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Rob, Plymouth

    Tuesday, October 20 2009, 4:29PM

    “M.G, Plymouth, you are without doubt, a first class, scale 'A' moron. Members of the armed forces are on decent money, but that is their choice. They chose to join up and earn that money, not sit at home, on minimum wage, and moan about every one that earns more. If you don't want minimum wages, get off your backside and either improve your situation or join up. (Though you need some spine to join up!!!!) Bonuses for being married? Get real. If you do not know anything about certain situations, do not comment on them, you will come across as a complete fool. Well done M.G, Plymouth. Also as married quarters are owned/run by the DHE, and "alterations or improvements" made by the occupant, must be returned to the original state on moving on.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by karen, plymouth

    Tuesday, October 20 2009, 3:40PM

    “we have had two mod properties 50 miles apart not 2 doors down!!! and we had an inspection to make sure the one we left was up to standard, the one we moved into was filthy. I have never known anyone in the forces get bonuses for being married!!! . Yes ok the money is better than the minimum wage but they work bloody hard for their wages and spend months away from home. Before anyone jumps in I know it's their choice!!!, I suggest if you don't want to live on the minimum wage sign up and get all the so called perks you think we get!!!!.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters