"main2">The official Government figures, released to the House
of Commons library, reveal half of the money received by local
authorities is net profit.
In 2006-7, the year for which the latest figures are available,
£42.7 million was collected from meters, pay-and-display
machines, parking permits and fines.
After the costs of paying traffic wardens and security staff,
running car parks and operating barriers were deducted, it left
a net income of £23 million.
Councils insist the money is needed to plough into services
that are underfunded by the Government. Without sharp increases
in car park charges, more authorities would be forced to breach
rules on capping council tax rises.
Torridge and West Devon MP Geoffrey Cox said: "The car parks in
market towns are a necessary cash cow to stave off the kinds of
rises in council tax that we would otherwise see because of
Labour's failure to fund local government properly.
"But it is causing serious damage to town centres. I have been
talking to councils about the short-sightedness of ratcheting
up parking charges. I have great sympathy with the councils but
I believe they have got to stop it."
Hugh Blaydon, a founding member of the Association of British
Drivers, told the WMN parking charges were necessary to ensure
commuters did not clog spaces meant for short-stay
shoppers.
"But it has gone up and up and up and local authorities have
discovered this is a way of bringing in money to help out their
finances. The motorist is seen as an easy target.."
In 2006-7 Plymouth City Council raised the most in the region
from parking charges - more than £9.2 million - which left the
authority with a net income of almost £5 million.
A council spokesman said the income reflected the fact that
Plymouth was the 14th biggest city in the UK, employing 60
civil enforcement officers and providing 21 pay-and-display car
parks and more than 250 meters.
Penwith council received a net income of £2 million from the
£2.7 million in fines and charges it levelled at drivers, while
Kerrier council, one of the smallest in the region, raised just
£490,000, which added only £196,000 to its coffers.
In Exeter, the 4,300 spaces across 25 car parks generated a
gross income of £2.6 million, producing a profit of £1.9
million. A city council spokesman said much of the money came
from the thousands of visitors to the area. "The income is used
to maintain this level of parking service and also contributes
to the council's overall budget, which in turn helps to keep
council tax charges down."
While the city council receives income from on-street parking
machines, Devon County Council retains the money from
fines.
Torbay MP Adrian Sanders said parking charges remained one of
the few areas of finance over which councils retained control .
"As a result they have become overly dependent on it, to the
detriment of town centres," he said. "Really the answer does
not lie in the field of car park pricing but in the reform of
council finances more widely."
A spokesman for the Local Government Association said:
"Councils don't use parking fines as a revenue-raising exercise
and by law they have to use all money received from fines to
improve local transport.
"It is not in councils' interests to clobber drivers with
fines, but it is their job to keep traffic flowing in town and
city centres and keep drivers moving."
Graham Holland, street scene manager for North Cornwall
District Council which generated net income of £1.2 million,
said: "A proportion of the car park income is used to support
infrastructure of car parks and to improve presentation of
parking facilities.
"Income is also used to help support delivery of non-statutory
duties like our Beach Ranger service and beach life guarding,
and other coast and countryside improvements helping to keep
North Cornwall clean and tidy for residents and visitors
alike."
14 Comments
View all
by Wendy Hart, Lipson, Plymouth
Thursday, July 24 2008, 9:55AM
“I was given a parking ticket for parking in a restricted parking area at the entrance to Wyndham Square, Stonehouse. I refused to pay because the sign was not visible from where I was parked, 7/8 spaces away. It is 6" from the ground embedded in ivy and tilted to oneside. It could not be seen whilst driving along the road because cars were parked in front of it. At the stage of tribunal appeal the council backed out by simply failing to respond or offer any explaination. If they could not
justify upholding the fairness of the parking ticket in the first place then why continue for 6 months to the tribunal stage with threats of increased charges. This incident has cause me considerable distress and the expense of paying for photographs to provide evidence of what I was saying. It seems wrong that the council is able to behave in such a cavalier manner without having to account for or explain their behaviour. The situation has not been rectified and the sign remains poorly displ”
by DrT, Ham
Wednesday, July 02 2008, 6:36PM
“Keith/Dave. The Herald are right NOT to open up this subject to debate as it will only attract inflammatory and racist comments from the bigots of Plymouth. I applaud their stance in this case. It prevents the further propagation of myths and mis-information that the article tried (admirably) to counter.”
by Nobby, Mutley
Monday, June 30 2008, 9:32AM
“The TWs have clearly got targets to meet, so common sense does not apply!”
by dave, honicknowle
Sunday, June 29 2008, 9:33PM
“davey , plymouth. also as they pick up as well. outsidethe steak and omlette i picked up a disabled couple who only go out once a fortnight ... and within 30 seconds of me goin to the door and letting them know i was there i walked back and he slapped a ticket on ... i explaine they were disabled ... he didnt give a toss. i have still not paid the fine . 2 years ago .”
by dave, honicknowle
Sunday, June 29 2008, 9:24PM
“keith .... there are quit a few of us that are waiting with our comments... perhaps the herald may eventually take the taxi voting thing off and replace it with this subject which is of more relavance to all communitys ?”