Decision on £43million plan to build 222 homes in Plymouth is postponed

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, February 09, 2012
Profile image for NeilShaw

NeilShaw

NO decision has been made on plans to build 222 homes in a former quarry in Plymouth - which were expected to be approved today.

Plymouth City Council's planning commitee met to discuss the £43million plan to build a new community in Hooe Quarry - and was expected to approve the scheme.

Instead, a decision on the scheme has been postponed.

The decision was already postponed on an earlier occasion so that councillors could visit the site.

Barratt Homes wants to build a waterside community on former Ministry of Defence land in Hooe.

​Members of Plymouth City Council planning committee had been recommended to approve the full planning application by council officers.

There has been opposition to the scheme from residents who fear traffic chaos, the loss of wildlife and overcrowding of local facilities.

There have also been concerns over a lack of affordable housing.

The Exeter-based developer acquired an interest in the plot, off Barton Road, last year.

It originally proposed 300 new homes – but dropped the figure to 222 in the face of local pressure.

The six-year project would include 22 apartments, four one-bedroom homes, 47 two-bedroom homes, 120 three-bedroom homes and 31 four-bedroom properties, including affordable housing.

Barratts would provide parking, more than two acres of open space and improved access to the site.

Since the consultation the company has proposed a footpath to improve pedestrian safety along Barton Road and proposed a mini-roundabout at the junction of Barton Road and Hooe Road to calm traffic.

Local campaigners say the development would add to traffic and create a bottleneck on the only road in and out of the Hooe, Turnchapel and Mount Batten peninsula.

The Turnchapel and Mount Batten Residents Association is worried that there is little space at local schools, dentists and doctors' surgeries, and fear that the local sewerage system would be overwhelmed.

Residents fear land contamination, with Barratts having to remove three disused MoD fuel storage silos on the land, which has lain dormant for decades.

7
Tweet this article
Report

7 Comments

  • Profile image for mcspredder

    by mcspredder

    Friday, February 10 2012, 7:35PM

    “A question if I may?

    Will 25% of the 3 and 4 bedroom homes be affordable?”

  • Profile image for pogle63

    by pogle63

    Friday, February 10 2012, 5:43PM

    “Balamory has been postponed then,probably not enough bungs going into the planning commitees back pockets come on Barratts you know the going rate.”

  • Profile image for Tessa43

    by Tessa43

    Friday, February 10 2012, 4:35PM

    “Hope they dont use that clour scheme. Talk about telly tubby land”

  • Profile image for NigeSM2

    by NigeSM2

    Friday, February 10 2012, 2:23PM

    “Another Plymouth City Council missed opportunity. Roll on the elections when we can hopefully get rid of this bunch of narrow minded spineless Muppets.”

  • Profile image for Peter20113

    by Peter20113

    Thursday, February 09 2012, 10:17PM

    “Come on Irene

    I don't want to live in a painting”

  • Profile image for irene61

    by irene61

    Thursday, February 09 2012, 7:39PM

    “this crass decision simply panders to the local nimbys. monies to pay for improvements has been lost, Barratts will appeal, win, and local taxpayers will be left footing the bill. All because the 2 Councillors Foster didn't have the balls to stand up to the locals”

  • Profile image for LHPlymouth

    by LHPlymouth

    Thursday, February 09 2012, 6:21PM

    “Try having an incinerator on your doorstep with hundreds of lorries!

    Seriously though - another case of our council carrying on regardless...no thought for the actual people of Plymouth. I'm sure you in Hooe, like us, already have open space...so why build a big development and then brag to be GIVING you open space?

    We have Blackies Woods claimed to be improved and made accessible to the public (thought it already was) in return for a massive incinerator...and guess what..now part of the land is contaminated (funny that) and only part of it can be improved..oh and another thing - only accessible through the 'visitor' centre of the incinerator plant and during opening times.....

    Who are we? .....tell you who we are councillors..we are the people who vote you IN or OUT!!

    Stand by for Leaves or Pengelly to speak up...don't they live in that area?”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters