Firm rejects incinerator health problems claims

Trusted article source icon
Friday, February 05, 2010
Profile image for This is Cornwall

This is Cornwall

WASTE firm Viridor has rejected claims by a leading chemist that their planned incinerator near Lee Mill will cause environmental and health problems.

They accused Dr Paul Connett, an expert in waste management, of being outdated and using discredited information.

Dr Connett, an adviser to the United Nations, told an audience in Ivybridge this week that Viridor's proposed energy from waste (EfW) plant at New England Quarry would be "an eyesore and an abomination".

Viridor is one of two companies bidding to build an incinerator to handle all domestic waste from Plymouth, Torbay and South Devon.

As well as New England Quarry, sites at Ernesettle and North Yard at Devonport are being considered.

Viridor has said it will go ahead with the New England Quarry plan regardless of which scheme the South West Devon Waste Partnership chooses.

The Ivybridge meeting on Wednesday was called after Viridor applied for planning permission and an environmental permit.

A Viridor spokeswoman said: "We reject Dr Connett's comments that our proposed resource recovery centre in New England Quarry near Lee Mill will cause environmental and health problems, which scientific research has shown not to be the case.

"The facility would operate to strict European legislation and would be closely monitored and regulated by the Environment Agency to ensure emissions are as low as they can be to protect the environment and human health.

"The Health Protection Agency issued a statement in September 2009 that was based on a review of the available scientific evidence. It concluded that modern, well managed incinerators make only a small contribution to local concentrations of air pollutants.

"It is possible that such small additions could have an impact on health but such effects, if they exist, are likely to be very small and not detectable.

"We would not proceed with any proposal which we perceive could have a harmful or detrimental effect on the area in which it operates.

"We believe Dr Connett's comments on EfW are outdated and have subsequently been discredited by a range of independent and credible institutions."

Dr Connett took part in the meeting at The Watermark in Ivybridge after accepting an invitation by the organisers from the Save Our South Hams and Ecoivy groups. He told an audience of about 60 people that, rather than build the £100million incinerator, Plymouth and Torbay councils and Devon County Council need to "go back to the drawing board" and consider other waste management options.

"We need to manage our waste and learn to live more sustainably," he said.

"An incinerator is not the way to do it. It wastes time, energy and money."

10
Tweet this article
Report

10 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by rubydog, south hams

    Monday, February 08 2010, 5:27PM

    “Viridor would deny that the earth was round if they could make money from it !”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Village Voice, Lee Mill

    Sunday, February 07 2010, 10:47AM

    “Hi Mike,

    When we found it so bad, we put our house on the market, at a low asking price losing all our equity, with out having to go into debt and stil no one would buy it, we tried to rent it out and no one would even rent it, it was that bad an enviroment. House's will drop in this area, and be difficult to sell ours is already on the market and has been the last 3 months. I wont risk my childrens health again.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Mick, Barbican

    Saturday, February 06 2010, 6:37AM

    “Quote- "For 5 long years we had to put up with the odour, flies, dust, mud from lorries and litter"

    You could have moved house..;)”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by fay, plymouth

    Friday, February 05 2010, 10:51PM

    “not forgeting the 98 million PCC get for puting it here ,money at the expence of our health”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Village Voice, Lee Mill

    Friday, February 05 2010, 5:56PM

    “I was once unfortunate to have planning permission granted for a landfill site within 100m of our garden boundary, we fought all the way to no avail, the only point we won, only inert waste within 200m of our boundary. For 5 long years we had to put up with the odour, flies, dust, mud from lorries and litter on the roads falling from the lorries that entered the site. It was totally horrendous. In addition we had further planning requests to extend the site, build an incinerator, and methane burner, we won none of the battles. I gave birth to 1 of my children whilst living there, he had food allergies, eczema and asthma two years after leaving he has none of these now. We also won a private case for loss of enjoyment of life whilst we lived their, it was not a lot once solicitors took there share but enough for a family holiday, not a lot for 5 years of hell. Eventually the landfill site bought our house so they could dump inert waste up to the boundary at market value; it is now a total blot on the landscape. This can not be allowed to happen again, no one knows the true health implications, as there is never any research carried out on the impact of these carbuncles.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article