BREAKING NEWS
 

Head of Royal Navy tells Government not to cut ships

Trusted article source icon
Friday, September 18, 2009
Profile image for This is Plymouth

This is Plymouth

MORALE among the Navy is being hit by the fear of future cuts the UK's top sailor has warned.

The

  1. Head of Royal Navy tells Government not to cut ships

    First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope

First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope, has said in a speech the

Senior Service was bracing itself for possible reductions under the

10% OFF ALL EXTERIOR PAINTING

JL Decorators

View details

Print voucher

This voucher entitles you to 10% off your quoted price.
Exterior painting only!

Terms: 1 voucher per person.
1 Voucher per household!

Contact: 01752 421998

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

forthcoming defence review, and acknowledged there would be "some

difficult decisions".

To an audience including Defence Minister

Baroness Taylor, he said that at a time of funding pressures, the fleet

needed to be maintained to help protect the nation and its allies.

The priority was "to keep the navy at sea" to uphold the service's morale, training and capability.

Sir

Mark also admitted that the decision to build the next generation of

aircraft carriers could be overturned, which could have serious

consequences for Devonport in terms of work and jobs.

Only this

week Defence Secretary Bob Ainsworth said the number of new nuclear

missile-carrying submarines could be cut from four to three, which

would also have implications for Plymouth, which refits the current

Trident-armed vessels and has multi-million-pound purpose-built

submarine maintenance facilities.

Mr Ainsworth said prioritising the war in Afghanistan meant that "major shifts" in defence spending cannot be ruled out.

It

comes amid fears that the Navy will bear the brunt of the strategic

defence review that is set to see military spending slashed.

After

years of fighting in Afghanistan and previously Iraq, there are senior

military figures who argue that more resources should be switched to

the Army, which has borne the brunt of recent operations.

It led top Navy brass to warn of the dangers of "sea blindness" among policy-makers.

It

has also emerged that Chancellor Alistair Darling has been holding a

series of meetings with his Cabinet colleagues to identify areas where

spending can be cut, after Gordon Brown admitted for the first time

that reductions would be needed.

Speaking onboard the navy's flagship HMS Illustrious yesterday, Sir Mark said the Navy was preparing itself for cutbacks.

He

said: "Will the Navy have to make sacrifices? There is not as much

money in the defence budget as they would wish there to be.

"Alongside the other two services we will have to make some difficult decisions."

He added that morale amongst Navy personnel was being affected by fears over possible future cuts.

"They

worry about the future and have a huge interest in the future and are

proud to be part of an organisation that is currently doing the

business the nation wants them to do and they want to make sure in the

future it is the same," said Sir Mark.

And responding to

questions, he admitted that the decision to build the next generation

of aircraft carriers could be overturned.

Although contracts had

been signed to build both HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales,

which are due to enter service from 2015, the defence review could

cause plans to change.

He called on the Government to ensure

that the Navy is not stripped of its ships and its capability to help

maintain global security.

Labour MP for Plymouth Sutton Linda

Gilroy, who sits on the Commons Defence Select committee, backed the

First Sea Lord's comments: "If he doesn't do it, who will?

"I

think the often expressed fears there's something of a sea blindness

towards the role of the Navy makes it extremely important he and others

should speak up in the months ahead."

Tory MP for South West

Devon Gary Streeter said: "The Navy is a force in its own right and

plays a significant supportive role to the other two forces. It's also

of crucial significance to us in the South West.

"We have got a

fight on our hands to make sure wherever the axe falls it doesn't fall

on the Navy. It's already been cut too far and too fast."

Labour

MP for Plymouth Devonport Alison Seabeck said she was not surprised at

Sir Mark's comments coming ahead of the mini-budget this November.

She added: "I share his concern about the Navy because of course for Plymouth there's work involved and jobs involved.

"It's interesting he saw the carrier programme as being one of the possible main targets for cuts.

"I

think we have to wait and see. Both Linda Gilroy and myself have been

talking about this, and will be talking to ministers as we approach the

pre-Budget report, and will be making the case very strongly we think

the carrier programme should continue.

"Any cut could have a potentially serious knock-on effect for our city, and we will aim to ensure that doesn't happen."

Baroness Taylor said later that there were currently no plans to cancel the contract to build both carriers.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for This is Plymouth

    by Martin, Plymouth

    Saturday, September 19 2009, 8:13AM

    “Mike, what could the Royal Navy protect us from? Invading jetskiers?”

  • Profile image for This is Plymouth

    by Andy, Plymouth

    Saturday, September 19 2009, 8:12AM

    “I don't get Albert's point. Our navy is about a hundredth or less the size of the American navy. We have no influence or power. It is a complete waste of money and effort. The global dynamic of Nelson's time has gone. Pax Britannica is a distant historical memory.”

  • Profile image for This is Plymouth

    by Mike, Plymouth

    Saturday, September 19 2009, 5:52AM

    “Ever changing world, in 20 years we may be out on our own, no longer the USA's poodle, an enemy of Russia, or of become an Islamic State (mark my words), what ever the future, we can not afford to let the navy reduce any further, this country has slowly let go of all that is good, so one day when the s--- hits the fan, and we need to defend our interests what will we have, nothing.
    The roll of the navy is changing and with drugs, modern day pirates and an ever changing world we need to defend ourselves.
    We must never take for granted that the USA will be their for us!”

  • Profile image for This is Plymouth

    by Tim, Tamerton Foliot

    Saturday, September 19 2009, 5:31AM

    “Perhaps some have forgotten that the Royal Marines are the Sea Soldiers of the Royal Navy and any funding cuts to the Royal Navy will ensure that our Marines are stripped of their essential funding. For those who think that the Royal Navy does not serve in Afghan i suggest you take a closer look. The Royal Navy is in its element there with men and women from every branch working alongside our Army colleagues. We may not make the news about deaths but our role is primarily support to those who specialise in Infantry style jobs. Before you start questioning the armed forces role in Afghan just remember that the military are the military as the are told what to do by their superiors (the Government) that you voted in.”

  • Profile image for This is Plymouth

    by Mick, Barbican

    Saturday, September 19 2009, 5:15AM

    “Monica quote- "it would be better if we just pooled a few defence resources and produced a better navy army and airforce than we have now and stop trying to keep tin pot britain as an interfering global power"

    Brown is America's willing poodle and does what Obama tells him, that's why the BNP says-"we are committed to withdrawing from the illegal and immoral wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the prosecution for war crimes of all Westminster officials who deliberately tricked this nation into those conflicts which have cost billions and at least 300 British lives."”

  • Profile image for This is Plymouth

    by Mr Justice, Plymouth

    Friday, September 18 2009, 10:40PM

    “The Royal Navy are the best and we should be proud of them. So they might not be involved in present dat action but i was proud to be there at all hours of the night when they returned from the Falklands. Battered, bruised, proud and victorious. There comrades lost and people i knew killed in action. They did our nation proud as they have ever done. Leave our Navy alone.”

  • Profile image for This is Plymouth

    by Uncle Albert, Plymouth

    Friday, September 18 2009, 8:44PM

    “Jessica yes you are right but my point is Royal Navy not Royal Dutch Navy, Royal New Zeland Navy ,Royal Australian Navy, theres only one ROYAL NAVY”

  • Profile image for This is Plymouth

    by Jessica, The Millfields

    Friday, September 18 2009, 8:37PM

    “I don't think we are the only 'Royal' navy. I believe there at least a couple of dozen. E G the Royal Dutch navy etc. Silly Albert.”

  • Profile image for This is Plymouth

    by Uncle Albert, Plymouth

    Friday, September 18 2009, 8:34PM

    “We live on a Island we need a navy for protection, after all we are the only ROYAL NAVY lets have a navy to be proud of.”

  • Profile image for This is Plymouth

    by Robert, Cowes

    Friday, September 18 2009, 6:30PM

    “When we were at Worthing High School together Mark Stanhope held none of these ludicrous imperialistic and nostalgic views. In those days he was quite rational.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article