Immigration threat now all too real
WHEN Prime Minister David Cameron declared he was in favour of Turkey being allowed to become a full member of the European Union, it was possibly of little more than passing interest to people living in the Exeter area or indeed the South West.
After all why should it be? The huge waves of immigration the UK has seen over the past few years has had little or no impact on the region.
-

NEIGHBOURS: MEP William Dartmouth is concerned about the impact of Turkey joining the European Union. Pictured is the capital Istanbul
Immigration, with its huge demands on schools, hospitals, housing and social services, was a problem for places like London, Birmingham or East Anglia.
Yet I firmly believe we in the South West should be concerned.
I am not saying that overnight tens of thousands of Eastern European immigrants are about to arrive overnight. It may not even happen for two or three years.
But it would be foolish to shrug our shoulders and believe it has nothing to do with us.
Turkey has a population of nearly 80 million. They are the poorest nation in Europe and would have the second highest population in the EU behind Germany.
Granting them full membership of the European Union would give every Turkish citizen the right to not only come here to work but to settle with their families.
Of course, not every Turkish citizen would immediately up sticks and come to live here. But remember when Poland became a member?
The Labour government told us not to be alarmed as only a predicted 13,000 people would come here from eastern Europe. In the end the figure was well over a million.
So why should we be concerned about Turkish membership?
In the run-up to the General Election, few people, if any, realised what the Lib Dem policy on immigration was.
Let me remind you.
It was to channel immigrants into areas of the country that had little or no immigrants. Away from the major cities and into areas where they could settle and work could be available. Places like the South West or the Scottish Highlands.
Few people took notice because everybody knew the Lib Dems had no chance of gaining power.
But today, through a combinations of events, they are sharing power in a coalition Government.
They have not changed their policy on how to handle immigration.
It is not just the threat of a wave of immigrants from Turkey.
In recent weeks three EU member states, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania have issued millions of EU passports to their ethnic minorities living outside their own borders.
People from places like Ukraine and Serbia.
Our membership of the European Union means anybody with an EU passport has a legal right to come and work in Britain.
Our Government cannot prevent it.
Today it is not politically incorrect to talk of immigration.
People have accepted that it is not about race its about space.
We are a small and overcrowded island and in many places social services are buckling under the strain of our open door immigration policy.
It is not too fanciful to fear that in the next year or so the Lib Dems views on immigration will hold sway within the Coalition.
Another danger for the South West in the advent of Turkey joining the EU is that of funding. Because Turkey is so poor, with a GDP per head of around £10,000, it would qualify for huge amounts of development money at the expense of other countries and regions such as the South West.
In fact, Cornwall and the Scilly Isles qualifies for just over 77 per cent of development money as compared to Essex which is eligible for nearly 100 per cent.
That is why the threat to Exeter and the South West is very real.
It is why dismissing immigration as a problem that somebody else will have to deal with is no longer enough.
Now is the time to let our elected representatives know immigration must be controlled now to avoid huge problems in the future.
During the general election campaign, Mr Cameron talked much of the Big Society.
Very few, if any, knew what this meant. But now we do.
It means that most of Europe will have the right to live and settle in the UK.
We are told the UK is to be fined £150 million for not properly displaying the EU flag at projects which have been funded by the European Union.
The solution is simple.
As we pay the EU £2.60 for every pound we receive, just fly a Union Jack twice the size of the European flag at all of those sites.
One further point. When the constitution was rejected, we were told the Lisbon Treaty was "different" because it had dropped all reference to the flag and the anthem.
So what flag are we actually talking about?








3 Comments
by Peter Jack, Helston, Cornwall
Friday, August 27 2010, 10:41PM
“How can we stop politicians who seem intent to destroy this country?
We could all send them a thousand emails - but they would ignore them!
What CAN we do?
March on Downing Street - -a million of us?
Riot?
This is not a rhetorical question - tell us! Please!”
by Will, Mid Devon
Friday, August 27 2010, 2:51PM
“Pete - how do you know that the BNP are the only ones telling the truth? That sounds a bit like the old story about the mother watching a troop of soldiers marching past, including her son, who says "my Jimmy's the only one in step!"
So what's this "truth" the BNP are telling that no one else is? We are getting a lot of information on immigration statistics these days. For example, how net immigration is still increasing, despite the fact that immigration per se has decreased - because fewer people are leaving than beforer. And that a large proportion of the current immigration is due to people coming in to study here - a big source of income for our educational establishments.
We are also told that some of these establishments are bogus, as are possibly some of the "students" at other establishments, and that this is a problem that needs to be addressed more effectively.
What other "truths" are we not being told that the BNP are privy to?
The BNP's cry a year or so ago was that no one was talking about immigration. That wasn't true then, but now everyone is talking about it, and have been since the run-up to the election. The BNP can probably take some credit for that - which is unfortunate because what drives most ardent BNP supporters is not the economic aspects of immigration but a dislike for foreigners, particularly non-white ones (as is made abundantly clear in their constitution).
The BNP have capitalized on the feeling of alienation felt by the poorest sectors of society, and caused largely by past government policies, to stir up resentment against immigrants, ethnic minorities and Muslims - often by propagating myths and falsehoods. Where is the "truth" amongst all that?”
by pete, pinhoe
Friday, August 27 2010, 2:23PM
“Have you been to a BNP meeting as they are the only ones telling the truth nowadays ?”