BREAKING NEWS
 

Man who dangled from Plymouth bridge told to curb his 'dopey' antics

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Profile image for Plymouth Herald

Plymouth Herald

A PRANKSTER who dangled himself from a footbridge over a busy city road has been told to put a stop to his "dopey" antics.

Lee Bassett appeared at Plymouth Magistrates' Court yesterday to admit causing danger to road users.

  1. Lee Bassett dangling from the footbridge

    Lee Bassett dangling from the footbridge

  2. Lee Bassett dangling from the footbridge

    Lee Bassett dangling from the footbridge

  3. The Herald front page of February 12

    The Herald front page of February 12

  4. Gdynia Way

    Gdynia Way

The 30-year-old had to be rescued by emergency services when a drunken prank went wrong – and cost the taxpayer nearly £5,000.

The court heard how Bassett, who gave his address as Clifton Road in North Hill, lowered himself off a bridge over Gdynia Way in a harness as part of a bet with a friend.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

Bassett's friend, however, was not able to lift him back up, leaving him dangling dangerously over the road on the approach to Cattedown Roundabout.

The defendant confessed to police at the time that he "had had a few jars" and "did it for a dare".

Magistrates gave him a 12-month community order with a supervision requirement, and ordered he do 200 hours of unpaid work.

The court heard how this was not the first time Bassett had been involved in a similar prank. He once had to be rescued by emergency services after attempting to swim across the River Tamar while under the influence of alcohol, magistrates heard.

Sentencing Bassett, magistrate chair Helen Harris said: "I might expect to hear this type of case in youth court but not in an adult court.

"Please stop being dopey," She told him.

"At your age that kind of prank really is not acceptable."

The police were called to Gdynia Way at 9.55pm on January 24 after reports of slow-moving traffic because of a dangling body, the court heard. Officers closed the road, initially suspecting it could have been a dead body.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) told the court how an ambulance and fire engine were called to the scene to help rescue Bassett from the bridge, costing the taxpayer £4,875.

Magistrates heard that the operation to rescue Bassett cost police £1,800, the ambulance service £675 and the fire service £2,400.

The CPS had asked for compensation to be demanded for the cost to the public purse.

But Mrs Harris declined to order compensation "due to the fact that the defendant still has money owing to the court."

Bassett, wearing a grey hoodie and bearing neck tattoos, still owes £419 for an earlier actual bodily harm conviction in March 2011, the court heard, having paid £100 of the initial sum.

Alex Travers, for Bassett, said: "This was a wager between friends that went wrong. Unfortunately when the friend dropped him over the bridge his friend could not lift him back up.

"My client admitted it was a foolish incident. It was never his intention to cause trouble."

Bassett was also ordered to pay a £60 victim surcharge which will be added to his outstanding court bill.

12
Tweet this article
Report

12 Comments

  • Profile image for HermesThelema

    by HermesThelema

    Wednesday, March 13 2013, 12:49AM

    “In the modern era it is best to notify the police in advance of any peaceful protest.”

  • Profile image for paulmh66

    by paulmh66

    Tuesday, March 12 2013, 1:28PM

    “OK, can someone explain how this cost 5k?
    Surely the emergency services get paid whether called out or not, so how does this cost 5k?
    It's like admin charges within certain banks/companies, it implies the admin staff are not being paid unless they are doing your admin. As this implies the emergency services are not getting paid unless "on the job". Utter nonsense. There was little or no extra cost to the tax payer as all services involved are being paid, on or off the job.”

  • Profile image for josdave

    by josdave

    Tuesday, March 12 2013, 1:00PM

    “The 30-year-old had to be rescued by emergency services when a drunken prank went wrong – and cost the taxpayer nearly £5,000
    Should have made the idiot pay back all of the costs with interest. All that and nothing resembling punishment to show for it. He is laughing at the "system".”

  • Profile image for CharlieDodd

    by CharlieDodd

    Tuesday, March 12 2013, 11:57AM

    “That harness looks painful”

  • Profile image for OutsideView

    by OutsideView

    Tuesday, March 12 2013, 10:55AM

    “What a waste of the court time!

    I suppose the poor box is empty otherwise they could have given him a contribution and a pat on the back!”

  • Profile image for jaygeek1

    by jaygeek1

    Tuesday, March 12 2013, 10:12AM

    “Yokel tool acts a knob and gets off scot-free because he already owes money to the courts but can afford to have tattoos and get drunk !”

  • Profile image for pogle63a

    by pogle63a

    Tuesday, March 12 2013, 10:09AM

    “Pity really he would have made a brilliant Pinata, shame no one had a baseball bat!”

  • Profile image for plympaul

    by plympaul

    Tuesday, March 12 2013, 9:26AM

    “a bet with a freind?? so if someone asked him to jump of a cliff he would jump??? what a silly boy i say!!”

  • Profile image for MrsT13

    by MrsT13

    Tuesday, March 12 2013, 8:49AM

    “Act your age not your shoe size.”

  • Profile image for PlymDavey

    by PlymDavey

    Tuesday, March 12 2013, 8:21AM

    “So in March 2011 he was fined £519 for a previous 'foolish' conviction. In the last 2 years he's paid off just £100 of that fine - that's about 80p a week this tw*t has paid so you can see how little of a damn he gives about the consequences of his actions.

    And because he still owes so much of this sum the court decides not to fine him for this latest 'dopey' act. Hardly a deterrant to stop this idiot doing something like this again is it?? I bet he's laughing at the feeble 'justice' handed out by the magistrate.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article