Ministers asked to look 'sympathetically' at water charges levy
MINISTERS have been called on to look 'sympathetically' at a national levy to ease the burden of hefty water charges on Plymouth residents.
Parliament heard the move would see bills for South West Water customers falling by up to £75, while costing householders across the UK just £1.50.
-

People should pay for the region's beaches which they come to enjoy, MPs were told at Westminster.
Plymouth householders have significantly higher bills than anywhere else in the country — an average £490 compared to £343. A main cause is that residents are paying for the clean-up of nearly a third of the country's coastline.
It has been argued this is a national resource, and so the cost should be spread equally.
Speaking during the last parliamentary debate before the summer break, Neil Parish, Tory MP for Tiverton ad Honiton who sits on the Commons Environment Select Committee, said water charges were significantly higher because the region had 30 per cent of the beaches but only three per cent of the population to pay the extra charges.
He said: "I should like the Government to consider some form of national levy requiring people from all over the country to pay for the beaches that they come to enjoy.
"We do not think that the retired people of the South West Water area should pay the extra charges.
"It would mean bills in the South West Water area falling by about £65 to £75, yet the national levy would be in the region of £1.50. I ask the Government to look at this sympathetically."
The previous Labour Government had tasked the industry regulator Ofwat with examining the options put forward by a review into water charging headed by Anna Walker, which proposed a raft of measures to deal with "regional unfairness" in charges.
Faced with calls for action to deal with the "unfair burden" faced by hard-pressed South West Water customers, coalition Government ministers have pledged the administration would do its best to get a "speedy resolution". But they warned of the need to "get it right", and said they wanted to bring forward environmental legislation plans.











9 Comments
View all
by gym user, plymouth
Thursday, July 29 2010, 6:46PM
“It does get me frustrated when you go to the local gym in town and the showers are left running. If the gym was on a meter they would not allow such wastage. I agree with the 'observer' who says that the businesses should be held accountable. We should all pay for what we use, simple......”
by ada, plymouth
Thursday, July 29 2010, 4:31PM
“share holders thats what we are keeping down hear ding ding money all the way labour did nothing iam sure the torys wont u can dream”
by David, St Austell
Thursday, July 29 2010, 3:16PM
“As long as the utility companies are privately owned the price we pay for essentials will be artificially high. As the man said in the TV ad "Got to have some bubbly for the shareholders meeting". The one thing I don't understand is why we should have to pay so much for water, which no-one can exist without.”
by S, Plymouth
Thursday, July 29 2010, 2:57PM
“Why can I only buy water from SWW, yet I can buy my Gas or Electricity form any utility company? Its now time to end the local monopolies.”
by Jannercide, The Muff
Thursday, July 29 2010, 1:04PM
“I think capped profits could be an answer. Any profits above the cap could be put back in to reducing the bills.”