Nuclear reactor being dismantled in Devonport

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, March 04, 2009
Profile image for This is Cornwall

This is Cornwall

A MASSIVE section of the nuclear reactor from HMS Vanguard is secretly being dismantled in Devonport, but the Ministry of Defence has insisted the project is safe.

A massive section of the reactor from HMS Vanguard – which was refitted and refuelled at Devonport dockyard between 2002 and 2004 – is being dismantled at the city dockyard.

Royal Navy sources have said it was the first time a submarine reactor had been cut up in the UK.

And campaigners against the storage of nuclear waste at the naval base claimed they knew nothing of the scheme and accused the Ministry of Defence of ignoring public opposition to reactor disposal work in the city.

They fear it is a precursor to the reactors aboard seven redundant submarines stored in the naval yard being cut up at Devonport.

But the MoD denied it was paving the way for further disposal work while the nuclear regulator at the Environment Agency insisted that the work was safe.

Ian Avent, of the Campaign Against Nuclear Storage and Radiation (Cansar), said: "This is the first phase in Plymouth becoming a nuclear scrapyard.

"The Ministry of Defence are going to use this project to justify doing all the other submarines here. What makes it worse is that they are doing it behind our backs."

Two Vanguard-class nuclear powered submarines – HMS Vanguard and HMS Victorious – have already been refuelled at Devonport.

Work on the third, HMS Vigilant, is currently underway. The last of the four ballistic submarines which provide the UK's strategic nuclear deterrent – HMS Vengeance – is expected in Plymouth as soon as that project is finished.

Cutting up work on one of the reactor heads – a domed, circular piece of high-grade steel measuring nine feet across and three feet thick – began nearly two weeks' ago.

The project has been sanctioned by the Environment Agency, one of the Government regulators for nuclear work.

Five years ago, the public rejected any plans to manage or store nuclear waste at Devonport after consultation on the Ministry of Defence's controversial Interim Storage of Laid Up Submarines (ISOLUS) project.

The project has now restarted following recommendations by the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM) in 2006 that the waste from Britain's nuclear reactors should be dealt with through deep burial.

There are seven submarines awaiting disposal in Plymouth, each with more than 160 tonnes of intermediate and low-level waste on board.

Independent nuclear consultant John Large said it appeared the entire reactor head, estimated to weigh 28 tonnes, had been irradiated rather than being contaminated with small amounts of radioactive debris. He said it represented around a sixth of the total reactor.

Mr Large said alloys used in modern steel manufacture meant the metal could have a half-life of around 5,000 years. He said the huge reactor head had to be cut up to fit containers approved for storage of low-level radioactive waste.

In the past, low level waste handled by Devonport has been transported to Drigg, in Cumbria, for storage.

Mr Large, who advised the Government of Gibraltar when repairs were being carried out on the reactor aboard HMS Tireless, said the latest project was "beginning to look like ISOLUS".

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence said the reactor "closure heads" were not being replaced because of "any suspected or discovered defect".

He stressed the project "is not related to ISOLUS".

"The reactor pressure vessel closure heads on all four Vanguard submarines has been or will be replaced as part of each refit work package," he added.

"This is not because of defects, it is to accommodate engineering improvements consistent with achieving longer periods between maintenance inspections."

He confirmed that the heads had already been replaced on HMS Vanguard and HMS Victorious "as part of a routine upgrade package".

"The radioactivity levels on the reactor pressure vessel heads categorise them as low-level waste," the spokesman explained.

"As a mature nuclear licensee, Babcock is well-equipped with modern standard licensed active workshops/stores and has skilled resources familiar with low level waste processing and disposal.

"In order to dispose of the reactor pressure vessel head it must be cut up to prepare it for shipment off-site and long term storage as low level waste.

"The reactor pressure vessel head from HMS Vanguard was transported off-site where it was cut up in active workshops before being prepared for storage as low-level waste in a licensed facility.

"Waste generated on the Devonport site is removed to nationally approved disposal sites which are agreed and approved by the nuclear regulatory authorities.

"The waste arising from the disposal of a closure head will be treated in similar manner and in accordance with the Devonport site licence conditions.

"The works are not being performed as part of any submarine disposal initiative. However, any low-level waste processing experience will serve to positively inform and clarify ongoing technical programmes."

Paul Naylor, nuclear regulator at the Environment Agency in the South West, said they had been aware of the disposal plans "for some time".

"This work poses no hazard to members of the public or the environment," he added.

"Any waste disposals resulting from this work will be covered by Environment Agency permissions, as have all previous disposals of radioactive waste, to ensure continued protection of people and the environment."

38
Tweet this article
Report

38 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by homer ludd, sweden

    Tuesday, August 25 2009, 3:56PM

    “So i guess i would be casted away like an unfitt dad if i raised my kids in the honour of the subs and named them vanilla trice or something like that ahurrrrrm when is the FUN running out of juice then?? ahurrrrrm ahurrrrrm
    /psychodad”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Avinalaugh, Intherealworld

    Thursday, March 05 2009, 9:08PM

    “Without going into nuclear physics.......Our government are Scots They let Babcock spend millions in Rosyth for the refit of the Bombers then sent them down to Plymouth. Rosyth now get the non nuclear refits of surface fleet. Portsmouth have no nuclear problem as its too close to the hierarchy. Plymouth People scratching for work are happy with the Sub refits...till they find out its Nuclear and the work thats going on. Its dirty work..but someone has got to do it ....and it has been going on for the last 15 years. Ask your local MP.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Rob, Keyhak

    Thursday, March 05 2009, 6:37PM

    “Goodbye then Luke and Jenny! Good riddance to bad rubbish! Nobody made you move to Plymouth with it's dirty streets, over the top council tax, boozed up kids etc,so why don't you just "do one!" Why wait 16 months to leave Jenny? Saving your dole money??”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Mick, Barbican

    Thursday, March 05 2009, 2:48AM

    “Quote-"This work poses no hazard to members of the public or the environment," he added.

    Hey that's exactly what they told the Bikini test veterans 60 years ago..”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Mick, Barbican

    Thursday, March 05 2009, 2:46AM

    “Quote- "A massive section of the nuclear reactor is secretly being dismantled..
    the MOD insist the project is safe"

    Why the secrecy then?
    Just don't drop it, okay?”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Reg, Plymouth

    Wednesday, March 04 2009, 9:09PM

    “So what have Gilroy and Seabeck got to say about this?, let me guess, 'well it will be a welcome boost for the job situation'. Just wait just as most of us thought Plymouth will become a nuclear dump where we will take anything for money and jobs. Think of the side effects and ever increasing numbers of cancer sufferers. Those who treat this news with a blase attitude will rethink their ignorance when a member of their family is affected.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Steve, Plymouth

    Wednesday, March 04 2009, 7:53PM

    “Portsmouth gets the "sexy" part of the Navy and we get the "ass end"”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Dockyardie, Plymouth

    Wednesday, March 04 2009, 5:35PM

    “Core blimey.... and there was me thinking it was the weather which has got much warmer the last couple of weeks!!

    Mind you it is better Babchop Marine is cutting steel rather than more jobs.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Cias, Plymouth

    Wednesday, March 04 2009, 5:16PM

    “Benny - I expressed no opinions on nuclear physics or biochemistry. I am not qualified to do so. I am qualified to give my opinion on the way in which Plymouth will be percieved by the outside world and express my concern. When I moved to Plymouth I recieved some tablets with my council tax demand. I forget what they were called but they were to be used in the case of a nuclear incident. The next year we didn't get them through the post but could ask for them if we wanted. I called and asked what they were and why they had stopped sending them. I was told thatnew EU regs meant they had to put the side effects on the bottles and this might scare people so they stopped sending them out. And you wonder why we might be a little bit worried? They knew that asbestos was a killer in Roman times and passed laws to protect asbestos workers in 1911. It wasn't until 1950's that they appreciated the true risks - and not until 1960's that they passed laws to protect us. A substantial number of people will be worried about the health risks. Simply put neither I, nor a great many people, trust either the government or private industry and they will have to go a long way to gain that trust.”

  • Profile image for This is Cornwall

    by Jenny, Plymouth

    Wednesday, March 04 2009, 5:06PM

    “Freedom of Speech ken you should try it one day pete writes,
    Well that is what he seems to be doing? Doh;
    Yes it was rather long winded he usually is, but at least he was contributing to the debate unlike Budoboy St Budeaux!

    If people shouted about this City then maybe you would get a level playing field? And some of those jobs might come here instead of always going to other Towns up country, talk about defeatest arttitudes, no wonder everyone thinks the United Kingdom ends at Exeter.

    Plymouth deserves what it gets nothing! I am so glad I shall be moving back up to the Home Counties next year. I remember when I first came here thought it was lovely, nice seaside place the Hoe the Moors and all those quaint seaside villages in Devon & Cornwall all that made up for the hellish journey getting here. I soon found though the reality was far different, a something for nothing its my rights attitude nothing could have prepared for the people, many of them it seems write on here, there are some really lovely people in Plymouth sadly though the rest of you let them down so badly.

    You have this attitude of wanting it done for you given to you for free and for no contribution, the Worlds moved on, PLYMOUTH GOT LEFT BEHIND. All you will have left is oh Plymouth a quaint little seaside town just on from the vibrant City Exeter, you know the City you cant get to, has no airport, and no Motorway links either, its just on from Exeter didn't they once have a Navy in Plymouth or was that Portmouth
    Just read Luke Plymouth's comment it says it all really about Plymouth, Students will be the only people coming here in 10yrs and of course all those Nuclear Subs needing to be cut up, but then again think of the Compi you will all be able to claim in years to come sums Plymouth up really!

    So glad I will be gone in 16 months time.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters