BREAKING NEWS
 

Nephew wins legal appeal to keep £800,000 farmhouse

Trusted article source icon
Friday, October 05, 2012
Profile image for Western Morning News

Western Morning News

An academic whose stolen lawn mower sparked a family feud could be turning in his grave after the nephew he called an "ostenstatious spendthrift" won the right to keep his £800,000 home.

Before he died, aged 90, retired art historian, William "Bill" Taylor, said his nephew Roger Taylor was "the last person" to whom he would leave his Grade II-listed long house, Lower Manaton Farm, in Callington, Cornwall.

  1. highcourt

The widower wanted to leave £650,000 to charity – but now his wishes have been thwarted by an Appeal Court ruling.

The court held Mr Taylor to a "bargain" he made before he died and declared that his nephew, and his partner, Denise Burkinshaw, were rightful owners of Lower Manaton Farm.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Sunday, May 26 2013

It was the disappearance of Mr Taylor's beloved Etesia lawn mower from an outhouse after his wife's death that made him realise it was not good to be alone and he invited his nephew along with Miss Burkinshaw and their two children to move down from their Sheffield home to live with him.

The couple set up home in the farmhouse's east wing, while Mr Taylor stayed in the west. But before Mr Taylor died in 2010, they were facing each other in the courts.

The nephew and his family were adamant that Mr Taylor had promised to leave them his home in return for uprooting themselves from their terraced home in Sheffield and moving south to give him companionship and care.

However, the pensioner insisted the only deal he ever struck with the couple was that they could live in the house rent-free if they contributed towards the bills.

In August last year, a year after Mr Taylor died, Judge Jeremy Griggs accepted the couple's plea that a "bargain" had been struck by the old man and awarded them the whole of Lower Manaton Farm, subject to inheritance tax.

Judge Griggs' ruling came under fire at the Court of Appeal where the executors of Mr Taylor's estate – including his niece Gabrielle Bradbury and her husband Peter – argued that the judge had been too generous to Roger Taylor and Miss Burkinshaw.

Leslie Blohm QC, for the executors, said the relationship between Bill Taylor and his nephew was "not easy" even before the widower decided to share his home.

Mr Taylor had, in the 1960s, "bankrupted" his nephew over an unpaid loan and the evidence was that he regarded the younger man as "a spendthrift, ostentatious and a risky proposition".

The court heard trouble brewed in 2009 when the couple discovered Mr Taylor had no intention of leaving them the house.

They went to court, claiming the old man had promised it to them, although he "vehemently denied" ever having done anything of the sort.

The court heard that the couple had helped the old man empty his bins, get his car in and out of his garage and put his laundry in the washing machine and, although that "did not amount to a great deal", the judge said it sealed the "bargain" they had reached with Mr Taylor.

In his final will, signed in 2009, Mr Taylor tried to leave £650,000 – more than half his estate – to charity.

He directed that the rest of his estate be split into 100 equal parts, with 55 of them going to his great granddaughter, Ms Constantine, 15 of them to Mr and Mrs Bradbury and the remaining 30 to Roger Taylor and Miss Burkinshaw – but only on condition that they moved out of the house within six months of his death.

However, the pensioner's best laid plans were defeated by Judge Griggs' ruling, with the asset that made up almost 80% of his estate going to the couple with whom he was engaged in bitter legal dispute until he died.

Dismissing the executors' appeal yesterday, Lord Justice Lloyd, sitting with Lords Justice Richards and Elias, upheld Judge Griggs' decision that Mr Taylor had made a binding promise that his nephew and Miss Burkinshaw would inherit his home and could not go back on that.

The couple had acted "to their detriment" in moving down from Sheffield to give Mr Taylor company and care and were entitled to hold him to his word, the court ruled.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for jabbathebutt

    by jabbathebutt

    Saturday, October 06 2012, 12:00AM

    “Is there any point in making a will while we are alive to have it overturned by some idiot when we are dead ? A final will should be exactly as it was done by .
    Its happening a lot lately and its nasty to see the rats fighting and idiots letting the rats win.”

  • Profile image for MissAnthrope

    by MissAnthrope

    Friday, October 05 2012, 11:49PM

    “A man who would rather give his money to charity than allow family to inherit it, and who engages in a legal battle despite being in his late 80s sounds delightful.”

  • Profile image for CharlieDodd

    by CharlieDodd

    Friday, October 05 2012, 11:24PM

    “..'The judges decided that Mr Taylor had made a binding promise that his nephew and Miss Burkinshaw would inherit his home and could not go back on that'..

    Did the judges actually hear him make the promise? Nah!
    And there's nowt in writing either, the case should have been thrown out for lack of evidence”

  • Profile image for bluebell2

    by bluebell2

    Friday, October 05 2012, 4:31PM

    “This smells to me greed comes to mind what this country has come to . bluebell”

  • Profile image for trudie2010

    by trudie2010

    Friday, October 05 2012, 10:18AM

    “And, a lesson to everyone, if you make any arrangements for the future with anyone, get it drawn up by a solicitor.”

  • Profile image for trudie2010

    by trudie2010

    Friday, October 05 2012, 10:16AM

    “Now now timplymouth, you must have fead the bit where they "took the car out of the garage, emptied the bins, and put washing in the machine" if that doesn't deserve an £800,000 listed farmhouse, then I don't know what does. Joking aside, we can just hope that this brings absolutaley NO happiness to the scrounging nephew.”

  • Profile image for timplymouth

    by timplymouth

    Friday, October 05 2012, 9:54AM

    “Did they have any evidence of this agreement or was it just their word against his?

    Doesn't sound like they did much to earn this house.”

  • Profile image for trudie2010

    by trudie2010

    Friday, October 05 2012, 8:56AM

    “So much for leagally binding will.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article