Poisoned by a sofa – and I want justice
A WOMAN from Plympton is suing a major retail chain after claiming to have been poisoned by 'toxic sofa syndrome'.
Paula Brooks, 41, who runs the Walkham Café on Burrington Way, bought a £700 leather sofa from Argos in March last year.
She quickly developed a rash so severe it led to six months of agony, during which she had to employ others to run her business and was forced to give up her beloved pets, believing they might be to blame for her crippling condition.
Around 1,000 people are taking legal action over health problems linked to sofas sold by Argos and Land of Leather, and made in China, in what is likely to be the largest class action in English legal history.
Paula, who has two teenage sons, said: “Although Argos replaced the sofa with a material one worth £300 less, they will accept no liability for my ill-health.
“I have never reacted to leather before and I regularly wear leather clothing, so I can only assume I was affected by toxic pesticides used to preserve the sofa, which the BBC's Watchdog programme identified.”
Paula's rash started as a small red area on her leg and developed into an inflamed, weeping mass which covered her legs, back, arms and face.
Suffering breathing difficulties and agony whenever she moved, she was eventually rushed to hospital, where she was put on a drip and told she had contracted severe blood poisoning.
She added: “Argos did not even send me a letter of apology.”
Paula lost at least £2,000 in wages to cover time she took off from managing her business in August, when her condition had reached its peak.
After several trips to the doctors and many prescriptions later, she also gave away her beloved cat and dog, believing it could be an allergy to them which was causing her so much pain.
She is now seeking compensation with the help of Leeds solicitors Godloves, which advertised specifically to locate people who believe they have suffered from 'toxic sofa syndrome'.
Andrew Charuk, of Godloves, said: “Argos retained the services of a consultant dermatologist, Dr Iain Foulds.
“His report states there is conclusive evidence the anti-mould agent within the sachets contained within the leather suites was the causative agents for the cases of sofa dermatitis and that di-methyl fumarate (DMF), in particular, was responsible,” he went on.
“A number of firms of solicitors have been contacted nationwide by clients who have purchased such suites and who have then gone on to suffer symptoms of skin allergies, rashes and burns and in some cases breathing difficulties.
“The sofa group litigation (class action) is likely to be the largest class action in English legal history.”
Paula said she heard an announcement on local radio about the sofa recall.
“Suddenly everything seemed to make sense. My health problems had started with the arrival of the sofa.
“I phoned Argos immediately and asked them to take it away. The minute it left the house I started to get better.
“My health has thankfully returned, as has my dog, and I'm able to work again but I've lost my cat and nearly eight months of my life to ill-health.”
A spokesperson for Argos said: “Argos would like to apologise to any customers who may have been affected by skin irritations linked to certain sofas manufactured by a company in China.
“The issue first came to our attention last summer and Argos withdrew the potentially affected items from sale voluntarily.
“We would like to make it clear no sofas produced by the Chinese factory are now sold in our business.
“As Ms Brooks' case is now subject to legal proceedings, we are unable to comment further on her case at this time.”
They urge anyone with any problems to contact their local GP and call them on 0845 640 2020.
No one from Land of Leather was available for comment.











9 Comments
View all
by Jill D arbyshire, runcorn
Friday, December 11 2009, 12:49AM
“I have one of those sofa and would like to know if anyone has suffed with fungal infection apart from the rash and bister.”
by paula, plymouth
Thursday, September 03 2009, 9:48PM
“This is paula from plymouth. I sympathis with all people that have been effected by these toxic sofas. I have got into financial difficulties due to ill health. I also had private health treatment which has worked on my immune system. I will be pleased when it has all ended so i can put it all behind me. My health has improved but is not 100% far from it! Unless you have been through this nobody would understand how unwell and tired you feel. I have my own business and I have 2 boys and am a single mum so being ill isn't and option!! you just get on with it.”
by carly, london
Saturday, August 02 2008, 7:02PM
“I would just like to say to molly from sutton you havent a clue what yr speaking about - My 8 yr old son developed an allergy to our sofa (which i didnt know) He came up with lumps all over his neck we paid privately (even though we didnt have the money - we had to get a loan) - we were told he could have lymphoma (cancer - 8yrs old) went through the worst 3 mths of my life he went through an operation to be told he had an allergy! and you have the cheak to say all we want is money - what do you think that my child deserved an operation - i as a mother deserved to think my child was dying - shut up and think before you speak
If it was you, your child or family would you have the same of the cuff comments.
Walk in someones shoes before you comment.
FOOL!”
by Molly, Sutton
Saturday, June 14 2008, 1:07PM
“'I want justice' !! How pathetic. She makes a noble word smack of a sulky simplistic impatient demand. She really means she would like a remedy, perhaps money to offset the illness and unpleasantness, an assurance of any necessary future medical treatment and an indication that it won't happen again. She has neither been murdered nor abused. She may been the innocent victim of a poor manufacturing process.”
by Molly, Sutton
Saturday, June 14 2008, 1:07PM
“'I want justice' !! How pathetic. She makes a noble word smack of a sulky simplistic impatient demand. She really means she would like a remedy, perhaps money to offset the illness and unpleasantness, an assurance of any necessary future medical treatment and an indication that it won't happen again. She has neither been murdered nor abused. She may been the innocent victim of a poor manufacturing process.”