Rubbish on our beaches leaps 50 per cent
THE amount of litter on the Westcountry’s beaches has leapt by nearly 50 per cent in the past year – despite a high-profile campaign to outlaw carrier bags.
The Marine Conservation Society’s Beachwatch 2008 survey recorded and removed 81,115 items of rubbish, including fishing nets, plastic bags, cigarette butts and cotton bud sticks from 56 beaches across the South West, mainly in Devon and Cornwall.
-

This represents almost five bits of junk on every metre-stretch of supposedly golden sand in the South West.
In 2007, beach cleaners found more than three pieces of rubbish per metre – which represents an increase of 48.1 per cent between then and now.
Once again, more litter was dumped on the Westcountry’s beaches than anywhere else in the UK, the survey revealed.
Emma Snowden, MCS litter projects coordinator, said: “Whether you live near the coast or miles inland, we are all connected to the sea. This is a man-made problem. Every piece of litter has an owner and we all need to take responsibility to not drop litter in the first place.
“MCS wants to see zero waste on Britain’s beaches and our first goal is to halve the litter on Britain’s beaches by 2015, but in order to achieve this we need to appoint lead agencies with the specific responsibility to stop marine litter and develop a marine action plan now.”
Experts believe the peninsula’s exposure to strong ocean currents and the annual influx of millions of tourists explains why litter pollution on South West beaches outstrips the rest of the country.
As well as spoiling the appearance of beaches, harming the region’s vital tourism industry and costing local authorities millions of pounds to clean up every year, the MCS said littering had potentially fatal effects on seals, turtles and seabirds that live off the region’s coastlines.
It believes more than 170 species of wildlife have been known to mistake litter for food, which can lead to starvation, poisoning and fatal stomach blockages.
Awareness of the dangers of plastic was heightened in 2006 when the town of Modbury in South Devon launched a boycott of carrier bags. The Prime Minister and supermarkets heaped praise on the Westcountry town, while scores of communities and Devon, Cornwall and beyond followed suit.
But the MCS said the amount of litter on Britain’s beaches has more than doubled in the last 15 years to reach record levels. It found 385,659 items of rubbish across the UK.
Beach litter can also be hazardous to people and costs millions to clear up.
More than 5,000 volunteers for the MCS surveyed 175.7 kilometres (109 miles) on 374 beaches for the survey, collecting 3,188 bags of rubbish last September.
More than a third of the litter picked up (37.7 per cent) was classed as “public litter”, which has come from members of the public and includes rubbish such as cigarette butts, drinks and food containers and plastic bags left on the beach or washed or blown over from other places.
Fishing litter, such as nets or angling lines, accounted for 13.8 per cent of the debris, while sewage-related rubbish was 6.2 per cent – of which 60 per cent was cotton bud sticks.








6 Comments
by Hoof Hearted, Blackpool Sands
Wednesday, April 08 2009, 4:29PM
“I agree with you Phil - look at all the dog ends on the beaches - round up all the smokers.”
by Phil, Sutton Harbour
Wednesday, April 08 2009, 12:39PM
“Failing to dispose of rubbish properly is loutish behaviour, whether at sea, on the beach or in the street. People who fail to clean up after themselves should be subject to arrest.
Extreme? I don't think so. When zero-tolerance policing was adopted in New York City, it was found that litter louts were very often responsible for a load of other crime. So, when they arrested a little lout, they very often found that he/she was also in possession of drugs or illegal weapons or driving an uninsured/unroadworthy car or had failed to answer bail - or all of the above and more!
I really feel we should do the same here. I think we would be surprised how many criminals would be taken off our streets.”
by Matt, Plymouth
Wednesday, April 08 2009, 11:47AM
“Who did they employ to count this rubbish? Maybe the average is brought down by stretches of coastline that have no rubbish at all due to currents or being a cliff, but go to places like Whitsand Bay and there is far more rubbish then 5 pieces per meter of beach. And it isn't only beaches either, go walk along the Tamar or Tavy and you get the same picture.”
by Angela, Plymouth
Wednesday, April 08 2009, 11:25AM
“You pay the same all over the country for gas and electricity so why isn't water the same?
I don't agree WE should pay to keep the beaches clean just because we live down here”
by zoot, zoots coot
Wednesday, April 08 2009, 10:02AM
“who gave the plymouth chavs transport?”
by Rhetorician, Plymouth
Wednesday, April 08 2009, 8:59AM
“It is hightime that residents of the Southwest were stopped being penalised in their water bills to keep these beaches clean.
Go to anywhere on EARTH next to the sea and the beaches will be covered in rubbish it is a GLOBAL problem so we should not be paying for it,
High time the cost of keeping the coastline clean was shared equally by all bill payers in the UK and not just those who live by the sea.
Cheaper water bills - for the Southwest - to hell with the beaches - hardly get time to sit on one anyway.”