Plymouth suffers 58 per cent rise in serious violence
CRIMES involving brutal violence in Plymouth have jumped by 58 per cent, according to new figures seen exclusively by The Herald.
The figures – which compare April to November 2007 with the same period this year – show cases of 'serious violence' increased from 102 to 161.
-

Plymouth-Chief-Constable-Jim-Webster
The incidents include knifings, glassings, kickings, dangerous driving and attacks with weapons such as baseball bats and Samurai swords.
However, overall, violence-related crime is down from 3,273 to 3,082 offences, and Plymouth's top police officer today insisted that, year on year, the city's rates of violence were falling.
But Chief Supt Jim Webster said he would re-focus on tackling the 'significant increase' in serious violence and revealed his team are set to introduce unique FBI-style profiling to understand why people are driven to commit such horrific acts.
Chief Supt Jim Webster told The Herald that tactics employed, such as improved knife awareness, stop searches, policing across Union Street, the Barbican and North Hill, the use of a 'Trojan' bus, high visibility patrols and community work by PCSOs with youths have all had a positive effect on overall violence. He said: "Year on year, violence in Plymouth is coming down.
"Offences of actual bodily harm (ABH) which make up the largest proportion of our total violent crime are down by more than 15 percent.
"Much of this has been achieved by improved approaches to keeping the city safe, with police working with CCTV, door staff and many others. But the serious violence – a small part of the overall violence – is seeing a significant increase."
Officers record serious violence as grievous bodily harm, but also incidents whereby the victim suffers minor injuries from an attacker who intended far more damaging consequences.
Chief Supt Webster said: "An example would be if someone who attempted to bottle another person, slipped at the last minute and instead caused a slight cut, we would record that as serious violence.
"In the past we would make the classification on the injury, not the intention. This approach to recording has moved some offences from minor violence to serious violence, accounting for some of the rise in figures. It's common sense to record them this way."
Other "serious violence" offences include death by dangerous driving, stabbings, poisoning, being glassed or strangled or attacks with all manner of weapons, from stiletto heels and baseball bats to Samurai swords.
Chief Supt Webster said: "I am concerned over the intensity of the violence in some offences.
"There is a gratuitous use of violence linked to alcohol in various parts of the city and while the numbers are small with no defined pattern or hotspot, what links them is a complete lack of regard for the consequences of this kind of violence.
"This is particularly worrying where weapons are used or when defenceless people are kicked, stamped on or repeatedly beaten."
Chief Supt Webster said police in Plymouth would renew their focus on "that small number of people who use sustained violence or weapons".
While the current tactics employed have proven useful in reducing overall violence, he admitted other methods are needed for the intensely violent, random and often unprovoked serious attacks.
He said: "It is a phenomenon within violent crime.
"There is no clear pattern, no clear group, no clear location.
"We need to look at the people we arrest for these crimes, look for patterns of behaviour, look for what sparked such violence, understand them in a way we haven't done before.
"We have already profiled locations and times for overall violence and as you can imagine it is heavily linked to the city's night time economy and alcohol.
"We have also already profiled offenders for overall violence and using this information has helped us focus our work and bring down general acts violence.
"We're now going to profile the serious violent offenders and focus upon them."
Profiling is a process which was originally created and developed by the FBI in the 1970s in an attempt to determine the nature, mindset and potential actions of serial killers.
The process involved analysing crime scenes and lengthy interviews with convicted killers to recognise and hopefully predict patterns of behaviour. Over the years the process has been refined and is used by several policing organisations across the world.
Chief Supt Webster said: "To understand why those people inflict very serious violence we will profile those we arrest. To target this kind of crime we look for patterns. One of the key patterns is the background and habits of the offenders.
"More work will be done around the offenders to uncover why they carry out this unduly intense amount of violence."











20 Comments
View all
by Snivelling Pete, Ford Park
Friday, December 19 2008, 9:13AM
“I am amazed at these scare stories. How many people actually ever experience this kind of aggression or violence. it touches the lives of very few of us. Society is not crumnling nor are we a wicked race. Some people just like getting upset about small minority behaviour. get on with life.
Frankly jim Webster telling us that he is going to have all local violent suspects profiled is the kind of half baked approach that completely misdirected the Colin Stagg prosecution.”
by paul, isleworth
Tuesday, December 16 2008, 8:14PM
“I think the British are inherently violent as a rule - they like to swagger and strut about to claim their space and power - lots of little people creating their own versions of the British Empire by protection rackets, drug rings, prostitution, wife beating, friend-pummeling and getting very very very drunk so that it all becomes a "bit of a laugh". The more stupid the people are, the quicker they plummet into this sheep-like neanderthal attitude to the very country they think they represent. By smacking someone in the mouth for no reason, waving a sword above their heads or letting Bully The Pitbull loose in a park full of kids is precisely why immediate life sentences should be applied to ALL violent acts. Sweep up the rubbish with 1 sentence and it will reduce drastically. Apart from the real numbnuts of course. I would be a really hard PM, trust me.”
by Well Heeled, Yelverton
Monday, December 15 2008, 8:47PM
“Keith, I couldn't agree with you more.
Can I add that I have been monitoring your postings for a while now and I think you should be running Plymouth...actually I would go as far to say the country.
The thing that gets to me is we all live in suburbs where we all know the scum. What we would all like is the ability to gang up and teach them all a lesson then they wouldn;t do it again. However the 'scum' can do whatever they want to us and PC plod ignores it or at worst '100' hours community service(but still keep all your benefits and run your drug gangs). However we the law abiding public, if we lay one hair on the scumbags, it's up before the beak for us and a criminal record and possibly a prison sentence. That's where this country has gone wrong.
You can say whay you want about the Kray twins, but there was no trouble on their patch.”
by Alex, Plymouth
Monday, December 15 2008, 8:39PM
“How does the headline 'rise in serious crime' reflect that 'year on year it is coming down - stated by Jim Webster.
Get more police on the streets not driving around in cars, texting,having a chat. Look how many cops turn up to a road accident, then sit there for hours doing sod all!
I have never seen this trojan bus. Apparently the police are allowed to travel free on the buses provided they are in uniform. Perhaps if they did so, they would see more and save money on police cars.
No doubt it will go down next year when someone works out how to massage the figures.”
by Do gooder, nice leafy suburb
Monday, December 15 2008, 7:59PM
“70 inch TV you say steve? I nominate you for the 'order of Lenin' as you truly are the peoples hero... Mine is a 32 inch thank-you”