Senior Plymouth Conservative calls for a debate on city airport's future
A TORY chief has called for a debate on the future of Plymouth Airport and aviation in the city.
Cllr Ian Bowyer, the city's Cabinet member for finance, yesterday called for a "mature and informed debate".
-

But he said it should happen after the council elections on May 3.
The company which operated the airport on a 150-year-lease from Plymouth City Council, shut it in December saying it was not economically sustainable
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
The company's lease allows it to sell the land if it closes the airport. The council would take 75 per cent of the proceeds.
In August, the council's Cabinet backed the closure after the production of two consultants' reports which said no one wanted to run the airport or flights, and not enough businesses used the airstrip to make it economically viable.
A campaign group, Viable, hit back with a business plan to reopen and run the airport.
Viable's chairman, Raoul Witherall, said yesterday that the debate should be held before the election so people would know which party to vote for.
"A debate is long overdue," Mr Witherall said.
Labour leader Cllr Tudor Evans said a debate was "an excellent idea".
He added: "I am sure we'll have one. But we would have been better off having the debate before the Conservatives let the airport close without a whimper.
"I am fully behind Viable's vision for phase one and phase two of their business plan. I have said that in a public meeting."
Mr Bowyer said: "I want to see a plan for Plymouth which makes best use of the current airport and meets the actual needs of all local people, be they members of the business community or local holidaymakers.
"This is something of public concern but it is important that we all understand the council's current position.
"The council has supported the airport since 2007 to the tune of some £7million.
"We have made a commercial decision informed by three independent studies, supported by the Chamber of Commerce, that the airport is not viable.
"We cannot sanction further investment from local taxpayers given the airport's low levels of usage and the absence of any interest from a commercial operator.
"We have protected the land from short-term development; the land remains categorised as an airport. We are willing to discuss any commercial proposal to operate the airport."
Mr Bowyer added: "I would like to see a public debate which is constructive and well informed.
"The council could organise this and it would be a chance for everyone to have their say, understand the issues, and agree a way forward. This needs to be held soon."




Comments
by b_mused
Monday, April 23 2012, 10:00PM
“According to an article in today's paper there is a debate organised by Viable with this councillor at the Future Inn, Derriford tomorrow (Tues) at 6.15pm. Talk about confusion but I hope to go.
This same character was on the local politics show on Sunday attempting to defend the location of the incinerator - can't say I found him convincing.”
by hstmtu4000
Monday, April 23 2012, 11:11AM
“Also this from the http://tinyurl.com/cjf842u regards our poor rail infrastructure from Julian Crowe, regional manager of First Great Western regards rail journey times and I quote "Plymouth would like to get them down even further but the challenge there is the infrastructure and other things," said Mr Crowe.
"Brunel built a wonderfully scenic piece of railway around the seawall. But the reality is there wasn't much of a business case for building anything faster then, and there still isn't really.
"The more controversial aspect of speeding up services is simply taking out station stops."
He said Plymouth businesses were asking whether trains needed to stop at Totnes.
"I think that is pretty unlikely but they are making their bid," he said.
So as I have repeatedly said Plymouth will unfortunately remain permanently handicapped rail link wise in the 21st century hence why the city must get key business air links up and running ASP.”
by hstmtu4000
Sunday, April 22 2012, 1:19PM
“The historical problem of the Plymouth to Exeter 52 mile rail route is twofold.Plymouth to Newton Abbot is more direct but with low line speed of 55/60 mph from the top of Hemerdon bank (Plymton) all the way to Newton Abbot.Newton abbot to Exeter is 20 very indirect rail miles.The section from Exeter st Davids to Dawlish Warren at the start of the sea wall for instance is 10 miles but only takes you about 1.3 miles closer to Plymouth,more than offsetting the 80/100mph line speeds on thus section.On a train bound from Exeter to Plymouth you actually pass under the M5 viaduct at Exminster travelling in the opposite direction of road vehicles travelling to Plymouth.You can check for yourself with this useful Google Maps Distance Calculator at http://tinyurl.com/6owx53k
Thats why in 1937 a new Dawlish avoiding line was to be built from Exminster near Exeter to Newton abbot due for completion in 1941 but the war understandably stopped the project even though the necessary land was bought and "Pegged out" ready for construction to start.Also a new route westwards from Newton abbot to near Marley head bypassing todays slow and hilly rail route via Totnes was also surveyed.Both schemes were both to be engineered to a minimum one mile radius curvature for high speed.But that was then.The only way to speed up the existing rail route now would be to use tilting trains like Virgin Trains use on the Electried West Coast main line fro London Euston to Birmingham/Manchester/Liverpool/Glasgow but that too also carries a financial costs.Its really down to how much taxpayers money the Government would be prepared to throw at the problem,very little I suspect.
Exeter to London Paddington by stark contrast is fast with line speeds of 100/110mph from Exeter to Reading via Westbury and 125mph from Reading to Paddington.”
by sweetlucy3
Sunday, April 22 2012, 1:13PM
“more housing seems whoever gave sutton harbour group plymouth on a plate in the begining should be dishonoured they rule the barbican and the airport what other important prime sites were they given. They bring property developement at all costs to shame and disrepute kick them out of our lovely city before they kill it off in the name of property building. Just look at the barbican full of flats thats what they stand for”
by Peter20113
Sunday, April 22 2012, 8:44AM
“@hsmtu4000
You are far wiser then me on this - I have just been to Newton Abbot by train (35 minutes) and it seems to me that the issue lies between there and Exeter. Was there ever a line proposed that would avoid Dawlish and travel through Kingsteignton, Chudleigh etc. The straight line distance between Newton Abbot and Exeter is about 12 miles which would knock a lot of time of the Plymouth - Exeter journey time.
ps don't use rude words like circumstance in your comments”
by hstmtu4000
Saturday, April 21 2012, 9:08PM
“In a perfect world Plymouth would not need the "limited" air links to London and some other key business destinations I mentioned but sadly the rail alternative west of Exeter is simply not a viable alternative particularly for business executives in the 21st century.The current rail route from Plymouth to Exeter takes the best part of an hour whereas,the other side of Exeter, an hour can see you half way to London.The contrast is pretty stark and sadly short of building a very expensive new rail line nothing is going to change that situation thanks to Brunels "atmospheric" mistake which has left Plymouth permanently handicapped rail wise.Rail line speeds of mostly 55/60mph between Plymouth and Newton Abbot now make it essentially a secondary not a main line.Thats why Exeter which is only 172 rail miles/2 hours from London can manage without an air link to London but Plymouth 245 rail miles/3 hours cannot.In those ci***stances not many investors are going to bypass Exeter are they!.”
by Dunthiel
Saturday, April 21 2012, 4:22PM
“From what I recall there were a number of daily movements by private air taxi and often private jets too carrying business traffic. These increased once Air Southwest stopped flights and continued up until the final days of operation.
However, with the greatest respect to users of this site, most people (especially businessmen) don't have the time to sit down and post comments here.”
by mcspredder
Saturday, April 21 2012, 2:50PM
“@hstmtu4000
While accepting all you say, if it were purely a business airport and that widely used, one would have thought that business jets would be flying in and out all day long.
Business people alone could obviously not sustain the airport and I was only pointing out my own very small use of the facility and enquiring as to others' use. There don't seem to be many replies.”
by hstmtu4000
Saturday, April 21 2012, 10:06AM
“mcspredder" Plymouth airport was never a mass "bucket and spade" airport,its very important economic roll to Plymouth was as a "city" airport which allowed key business people quick access to our otherwise peripheral city.For instance at the local engineering company I worked which was part of an American owned Group of companies we were often visited by the Groups senior managers in America who would fly into Gatwick and then fly seamlessly onto Plymouth.Now after say a 7 hour or more trans Atlantic flight executives who ultimately decide where their business goes dont want to spend another 5 or 6 hours getting to Plymouth because of our otherwise inadequate transport links.That is the true value to Plymouth economy of having those limited but key air links particularly to London.”
by Workitout
Friday, April 20 2012, 11:39PM
“It has closed because the MOD stopped using it as the Forces reduced.”