“I used to be a member, i won my case with the help of W.D Wilson & F4J.
Now i'm being persecuted by Hereford FEMINAZI'S employed by Hereford Council.
I have tried to get my local Hereford Councillor involved in this issue of persecution, they refuse to help".HEREFORD IS FULL OF FEMINAZI'S.
If things dont improve i might join F4j again, what have i to loose, i'm unemployed so i might as well make myself usefull!!!
"FREE JOLLY NOW & KEEP THE GOOD WORK UP GUYS"”

“I have mixed feelings. I think that the manner of the protests has generally been harmless, often stylish and witty and society should be prepared to suffer a little disruption so that others can publicly protest. On the other hand the issues are not so simple. Few of us would trust most meddling narrow minded self-righteous social workers to play god in settling family contact arrangements. However the four demands of this fathers' group are difficult to accept. There should be no presumption that either mother or father should is the better carer but there has to be a principal carer and it cannot be 50/50. Open Courts are not appropriate in children cases where the privacy and identity of the children must be respected and where miscarriages of justice can be dealt with more openly and swiftly in the appellate courts. there is already mediation. making it compulsory would enable an intransigent party to slow the eventual decision and the arbitrator/mediator would have no power which could not in turn be challenged with a doubling up of the contested process. Enforcement is already available. Those who fail to comply with orders or agreements made or sanctioned by the court can already be brought to book using the contempt process and this is applied to either mother or father equally. The aggrieved parent should generally move faster to use the courts powers if there is a breakdown or breach.”

“I have mixed feelings. I think that the manner of the protests has generally been harmless, often stylish and witty and society should be prepared to suffer a little disruption so that others can publicly protest. On the other hand the issues are not so simple. Few of us would trust most meddling narrow minded self-righteous social workers to play god in settling family contact arrangements. However the four demands of this fathers' group are difficult to accept. There should be no presumption that either mother or father should is the better carer but there has to be a principal carer and it cannot be 50/50. Open Courts are not appropriate in children cases where the privacy and identity of the children must be respected and where miscarriages of justice can be dealt with more openly and swiftly in the appellate courts. there is already mediation. making it compulsory would enable an intransigent party to slow the eventual decision and the arbitrator/mediator would have no power which could not in turn be challenged with a doubling up of the contested process. Enforcement is already available. Those who fail to comply with orders or agreements made or sanctioned by the court can already be brought to book using the contempt process and this is applied to either mother or father equally. The aggrieved parent should generally move faster to use the courts powers if there is a breakdown or breach.”

“Michael I only hope you are never put in the position that some vengeful woman stops you seeing your children/ grandchildren becuase she can/ wants more maintenance/ thinks she is the virgin mary to be obeyed or because you have a new partener who she objects to or she has a new partner and therefore wants you out of the childrens lives and wants new partner to become replacement dad.
Clearly that hasn't happened to you yet, but for some people up in front of the biased family court judges and magistrates who are toothless old duffers it has happened.
Surely a disruption to your journey isn't too much of a price to bear to acknowledge the sheer pain of having your children removed from you by your ex, sponsored by the state and your taxes.”

“Although I agree with you Gerry but you are talking about something completely different. F4J is about helping the honest hardworking, dad maintain a meaningful and responsible relationship with his children. Sadly SOME women for whatever reason choose to use deny this despite court orders and agreements, which even though they are made are seldom enforced by the family courts making them useless or as good as. Of course if a bloke was a voilent or malcontent type you would also expect that he be kept well away from children, however in most cases this is not so. Its not about taking a mothers rights away it is about recognising and if necessary re-enforcing the rights of fathers. I hope that you never get stuck in this rubbish system or if you do it will have been overhauled and made a darned sight fairer than it is now.”