Tom Mackenzie: Population explosion and immgiration, the greatest challenge we face
MANAGING human population growth will be one of the biggest challenges of this century.
Two years ago, I remember being alarmed to learn that, somewhere, the seventh billion human being had been born.
When we are struggling to provide work and homes – even in this still rich country – for our own British young people, how are we going to provide similarly for such numbers in its poorest regions?
Even more worrying is that some pundits estimate the planet's population will not level off until 14 billion has been reached (even in the best scenario, it is said to level off at around nine to 10 billion in the 2060s).
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013
UKIP's 2nd place finish in the recent Eastleigh by-election has been attributed by many to the party's focus on immigration.
And with the expected influx of Romanian and Bulgarian workers next year certain to add pressure to our already stretched public services, the British public has a right to be concerned.
Our own island serves very well as a microcosm of what is happening beyond our shores. When the Romans arrived here 2,000 years ago, it is thought that between 1.5 and 2 million people lived here.
It took the whole fifteen-hundred-year period, right up to the reign of Elizabeth I, for that number to double. Yet in just the next 500 years it grew fifteen fold. If we already have a housing problem with strains on public services such as hospitals, schools, transport, only a person in denial would dispute that the expected influx of Eastern Europeans would not further exacerbate it greatly.
Like other developed countries around the world, the UK has a demographic time bomb about to explode; many would argue that a smaller and smaller workforce supporting a larger and larger retired sector is an even more alarming problem than that posed by rising immigration.
Yet if Britons' birth rate is insufficient, they say, we must bolster it with fecund young people from abroad. This, we have to admit, is a cogent argument.
What was needed (and still is) was a national debate in which all these issues could be thoroughly aired. But we didn't get it. What we got from the Blair government instead was a sly and silent opening of the floodgates, which resulted in a totally unfocused rush towards this country of people with minimal skills and often a hostile outlook towards us. The flood was greater than any known in our history before. It was, in fact, a scandal, perhaps even a crime.
What was actually needed was a measured import of those high in skills of the sort this country could have benefited from economically.
What was not needed was what amounted to an assault on the working classes by importing people who would work for next to nothing and take the jobs which otherwise would have been theirs. The crime, as I see it, is here.
Yet I believe there was also another crime in pursuing a policy which has the capability, perhaps, of changing the character of our nation forever without securing the consent of the people.
I believe in being open and accommodating to people of all races. After all, no people on the planet have had greater experience of rubbing along with people from other cultures. Ours was the most benign, dynamic and just of all the European empires. Indeed, a local Algerian shopkeeper once told me he saw his own father shot dead before him by the French during their war for independence. Better, he said, had Algeria belonged to the British Empire. "Why? I asked. "Well, they were gentlemen," he replied.
I'm not saying we never did terrible things: consider Amritsar in the Punjab in 1919, when Ghurkhas under a rogue British brigadier shot dead 400 people at an illegal protest gathering. But at least there was a hell of a public hullabaloo, and a court of inquiry afterwards.
Yet despite such isolated incidents, none of the other former empires have been able to inspire such warmth and a feeling of togetherness. We therefore have no need to take lessons from anyone in how to treat people from other lands. Except, perhaps, from that other former colony of ours which feels the greatest warmth of all to us, but which, strangely, does not belong to the Commonwealth: the United States.
There, if you want to make that country your home you have to accept all its values; citizenship comes as a complete package. You must be an American first, and a Hispanic, Japanese or Pakistani second. The US does, however, have problems with its own burgeoning population. But at least it enjoys the luxury of having 32 times more space than we have.
It seems certain that whatever measures the world takes, it cannot hope to stop that seven billionth baby being joined by another three billion others before this century is halfway through.
But I am with David Attenborough in believing that human resilience will win through in the end. This has to be by raising living standards in the Third World. Only by spreading prosperity will you put effective brakes on population growth.
Show me a First World country with an out of control birth rate (except, that is, where out of control immigration has been allowed).
The greatest service we could do for Africa is to get rid of the protectionist and cruel Common Agricultural Policy. Our chance to do that is coming soon when the Euro nations need our agreement for treaty amendments in the years ahead. Plus, we must bite the bullet where GM foods are concerned.
Contrary to what Prince Charles may believe, only with vastly increased yields will we have any hope of filling all those extra hungry mouths.






10 Comments
by OutsideView
Sunday, March 24 2013, 4:56PM
“"even in this still rich country "
Which country is this person living in, certainly not the UK as it is bankrupt!”
by pogle63a
Friday, March 22 2013, 8:04AM
“No Waltersmith I have a problem with a system that supports people who come here to abuse it.
Playing the old there never were any indiginous population is pretty rubbish statement really as despite being conquered over and over again this country did produce a culture and a people who considered themselves British and had a strong culture and language, so much so that it conquered and ruled a third of the Globe.
So your statement is pretty void of sense really.
Our culture and traditions are being undermined and eroded away by an immigration system that is out of control that allows people into the country who cannot and don`t want to do anything but milk a system that allows them to do so, with of course the help of people such as yourself who can fill out forms for them and see to it that they don`t forget to claim for every penny they can.
Meanwhile my ageing struggling parents cannot even get help for a pair of glasses having worked all their lives. Brian 137 has the right idea.”
by Brian137
Friday, March 22 2013, 4:38AM
“Waltersmith
I don't agree with your comment, I think people who were born in this country and have paid taxes all their lives should come first and anything that's left over; that's fair enough. The Tory's made promises that they would put tighter controls on immigration, which they've failed to do. In the Plymouth area alone there are hundreds of foreign nationals surviving on the benefit system and many are going straight into council or trust owned property simply because they have partners (married & unmarried) & a few with children, which tips the balance against singles or married couples whether they're long standing English citizens or not.
UKIP are not another BNP, they simply want us out of europe, which I personally agree with. The reasoning being the unbelievable cost of our membership, which I'm lead to believe is currently in the region of 2 billion a year. This of course excludes the occasional 'donation' we are forced to make to such countries as Spain and Greece etc and then of course there is our 'open door' to any individual the Eu decides to point our way (we cannot say no and we are told that there are hundreds of Romanians on their way here as well), you work out over a year what each family on benefits cost the tax payer. Remembering that a person who's just come into this country is on as much as £250 per week, a pensioner takes home about £120 in that same period, is this fair after the pensioner has undoubtedly paid taxes all his or hers lives? and most pensioners have to pay council tax whilst others on benefits get a subsidy.
I totally disagree with the idea that the Eu offers anything apart from a drain on our national resources and ultimately brings into play an unfair system, which seems to favour the European over the English.
I now await with baited breath for this comment to vanish and an email to arrive from the Herald declaring 'You can't say that!'
It's still a free country though no matter what Mr Cameron etc have to say & free speech hasn't been voted out yet.”
by Waltersmith
Thursday, March 21 2013, 10:31PM
“@pogle63
So you do have a problem with immigration.
The UK is made up of immigrants, it never had an indigenous population”
by pogle63a
Thursday, March 21 2013, 6:22PM
“I do not have aproblem with immigration or immigrants if they come into the country in a controlled manner and can work and contribute to our society. I would appear however that immigration is not under control and people are flooding into the country to try aqnd claim benefits and free medical care, putting the provision of both at risk to those people who it was desinged to help. Non UK resident children getting Child Benefit payments in their native countries.
Is it not obvious that when benefits claims forms have to be produced in a multitude of languages other than english, that the people claiming obviously cannot read or speak our language and therefore really shouldn`t be here.
This country is a farce. In this time of austerity should we really be paying benfits to non english speaking people, child benefit to children living overseas that have never been here or providing health care to anyone who can manage to make it to a hospital.
I don`t really care who clamps down on this flood of people so long as someone does and does it soon.”
by CharlieDodd
Thursday, March 21 2013, 5:08PM
“When I look at the mess the main parties are making, I sit back with a big self-satisfied smug grin thinking "That's nowt to do with me,my conscience is clear because I vote UKIP"..:)”
by Ken_Gremlin
Thursday, March 21 2013, 12:43PM
“Oh great, someone else who's read the UKIP manifesto and now thinks they know it all.
This reads like an essay by a right-wing sixth former. Except if I was marking it, I'd downgrade it for a lack of sufficient references.”
by Waltersmith
Thursday, March 21 2013, 10:03AM
“@sunshadow
I think it has something to do with UKIP, population, what wonderful people the British were to the people of the empire, birth control, the Amritsar massacre.
By the end of reading the article I wished that there were only 6,999,999,999 people on the planet”
by Sunshadow
Thursday, March 21 2013, 9:38AM
“More then 7 billion people have been born, it's just that they are not all alive now!
I still don't get what he's rambling on about! *yawn*”
by Waltersmith
Thursday, March 21 2013, 9:04AM
“What exactly are you trying to say?”