Plympton man banned from taking his pet owl for a walk
A PLYMPTON man has been banned from walking with his owls in public after he was reported to Plymouth City Council.
For the past nine years, Russell Burt, 74, has walked with his beloved owls around Plympton and the Ridgeway, where people enjoy looking at these magnificent birds.
-

BANNED: Russell Burt, the 'Plympton Owl Man' has been banned from walking the streets with his birds by the council
Mr Burt, who has lived in the same house in Plympton for the past 40 years with his wife Joy, 63, says he was first approached by police on the Ridgeway after a member of the public reported him, saying his birds should be asleep by day.
The police said the matter would be reported to the council.
Mr Burt added: "The council came out last Wednesday: a dog warden and another woman in two vans. They told me that it was a danger to the public on a public highway and dangerous to the cars and asked if I was insured, which I am. But they liked the birds very much."
The council still allows Mr Burt to visit care homes and shows with his owls.
He does not ask for any payment but accepts donations to Woodside Animal Welfare Trust.
"I've just got to take it, I suppose. You feel upset and angry. The owls love going out and about," said Mr Burt, who is raising money for Help for Heroes at Elburton this weekend.
"I can't see how it's causing a danger to the public on the highways if I can go to the shows where people are."
He currently owns seven owls: Ben, a Bengal eagle owl, Spot, an African spotted eagle owl, Mika, a tawny owl which he rescued after a road accident, an African white faced scoptail called Scoppy and three other barn owls called Misty, Chas and Scruff
A council spokeswoman said: "We spoke to Mr Burt about travelling along busy roads with his pets as, in the wild, owls live a nocturnal lifestyle and we are concerned about welfare issues around exposing it to loud and hectic environments.
"There are also safety issues for the public around a large spooked bird of prey running amok on a highway.
"We are more than happy for him to continue showing the animal in controlled environments such as schools and care homes, but to protect him, his pet and the public we have asked that he finds alternative forms of transportation."








63 Comments
View all
by Bob Nesbitt, Perth (Scotland)
Saturday, August 14 2010, 9:39AM
“Jane Smith says ban horses from the public highway. Surely the best way to stop all accidents would be to ban people. on foot or in vehicles, from the highway!”
by Robin Godbeer, Plympton
Friday, August 13 2010, 8:36PM
“I have worked with various birds of prey including many species of owl for twenty two years. In all that time not one owl ever attacked a member of the public, caused a vehicle accident or any other incident.
Firstly, owls are NOT strictly nocturnal and any domesticated owl will spend as much time awake during the daytime as it will during the night, even totally wild owls hunt during both day and night when they have chicks to feed.
I have seen some comments about their eyes being unable to stand daylight because they are tubular not round. Owls eye 'balls' are indeed tubular but this is absolutely nothing to do with their seeing abilities in low light! Their eyes are in fact biological binoculars with adjustable front lenses, unlike our own lenses which alter shape to focus, the owl is able to go one step beyond this and actually alter its sight magnification to 'zoom in' on its prey. In bright light its pupil simply dilates just as our own do to compensate.
As far as an owl being 'spooked' as the council seems to think, the owls ears are far more sensitive than our own in order to locate their prey in total darkness, unlike us however, they also come equipped with an inner mechanism which snaps a skin 'valve' shut if the ambient noise rises above a certain level in order to protect the delicate inner membranes. A sudden loud noise close by would startle us but not the owl! (Thunder for example)
It is high time that both the police and the local council stopped taking their lead from uninformed kill-joys who have nothing better to do than take out their frustrations on a defenceless man and his well loved and cared for birds who have done nothing but good for the local community for the last nine years!”
by Wendy Stearman, Plympton
Friday, August 13 2010, 6:46PM
“Mr Burt and his owls brighten up a persons day. I love it if i see him out on the Ridgeway. His owls are happy,loved and well cared for. He has insurance for them and they are tethered to him and in the 9 years he has been walking them there have been no accidents or incidents.
The council should stop wasting time and money making themselves look like fools and retract this ban immediately. What will come next? Dogs and children who have no insurance and probably have caused accidents?
The person who complained should be ashamed for being such a misery and go and do something constructive with their life instead like joining Mr Burt in his fundraising events perhaps.”
by Give it a rest..., Far away.......
Friday, August 13 2010, 7:06AM
“Mick,Barbican..........
SHUTUP.!!”
by Mick, Barbican
Friday, August 13 2010, 6:27AM
“Incidentally, why are some owls mostly white? Did evolution get it wrong by not making them jet-black for night camouflage?
I mean you never see a white bat..”
by Dave Wilkinson, Plimuf
Friday, August 13 2010, 3:34AM
“This story made me so angry I almost turned my head right round. The council needs to wise up and stop acting like a bunch of twits, wasting time on such a barn-owl matter as this. This sort of thing should definitely be allowled, I think it's a real hoot to see such a talonted man out and about with his birds instead of just seeing them at official owl tawnyments. I may write to parliament about this. Owl always love you Mr Burt.”
by jane smith, plympton
Friday, August 13 2010, 12:07AM
“ban horses on public highways they are
more likely to cause the accidents. people who dogs and neglect looking after when they escape and run freely around the streets. If there had been any doubt that the welfare of these birds was in danger why has it taken 9
years to comment. PCC start you spending money on more advisors to deal with telephone calls so people can are not placed in a queue for over an hour and to prevent stress for those trying to sort out letters of threats u have sent them for delayed payments.
PCC u suck”
by graham, every were
Thursday, August 12 2010, 11:27PM
“@lazyoldfool mutley. prehaps we ban pets all together as buy your reasoning keeping any creature captave is wrong hmm”
by neighbour, plympton
Thursday, August 12 2010, 10:25PM
“When the council came out here mob handed (proof that they are overstaffed) to reprimand this mindless hooligan in the name of public safety...they chose to ignore the fact that the pavements were blocked by illegally parked vehicles and bins left out 24/7.
As for the animal welfare issues...some of these birds are rescued after vehicle collisions...if not for this man they would be dead...
To the person who complained..is your life really that dull ?
Once again the council demonstrate their total lack of focus and priority. How about getting the pavements cleared before the schools reopen. Or do you consider children having to walk in the road safer than an unlikely attack by an owl ?
Beyond belief !!!”
by Mick, Barbican
Thursday, August 12 2010, 9:31PM
“A bloke used to walk round the Barbican with a monkey on his shoulder but he tripped over a few months ago and it done a runner, it shows creatures don't like riding round on peoples shoulders..”