Council chiefs' World Cup trip was 'money well spent'
COUNCIL chiefs have defended their decision to visit South Africa as part of an England 2018 World Cup bid delegation, writes Political Reporter Keith Rossiter.
Barry Keel, chief executive of Plymouth City Council, said lessons learned by the delegation would save the city far more than the £5,700 cost of the five-day trip.
-

Mr Keel, council leader Cllr Vivien Pengelly, and Doug Fletcher, chairman of Plymouth's 2018 World Cup bid group, returned from South Africa this week.
They said they had learned valuable lessons by seeing first-hand how South African authorities have organised their tournament.
The visit, which took in three cities and three matches, was organised and partly funded by the Football Association. Plymouth City Council paid £5,700.
The trio watched three World Cup matches.
They saw South Africa draw against Uruguay at the 43,000-seat Loftus Versfeld Stadium in Pretoria, similar in size to Argyle's proposed extended Home Park stadium.
In Cape Town's magnificent Green Point stadium they watched a disappointing draw between England and Algeria.
The biggest stadium they visited was Johannesburg's Soccer City, where Brazil beat Ivory Coast 3-1.
Mrs Pengelly said they were part of a 40-strong group from the potential host cities who met South African organisers and saw first-hand the pitfalls of staging World Cup matches and Fan Fests.
She said she had kept the trip secret for security reasons. "If I had told the media, I would have been telling the whole of the city that I was away.
"I have been told by the police not to tell anyone when I'm away.
"In the past we have had two Lord Mayors who were burgled when they went on publicised trips.
"I certainly didn't want to come back to a house that has been ransacked. My security is of paramount importance."
Mr Keel said that last year city councillors voted unanimously to support Plymouth's bid, and there was no need for another debate on whether to send a delegation to South Africa
"It was very important that Plymouth was represented at a high level. If we had not been there it would have sent a poor message about Plymouth's level of ambition and commitment."
Fifa will decide in December whether England should host the 2018 World Cup.
Plymouth is one of 12 cities short-listed to host games in the tournament, but there is no guarantee that all 12 will be chosen.
Mr Keel said that Plymouth's absence could have harmed the England bid as well as Plymouth's own chances.
Mrs Pengelly said: "We did think long and hard about whether we could afford to take part in the visit at a time of economic difficulty, but on balance we felt it would have been a false economy not to have gone.
"It would have sent out a very poor message about the seriousness of our ambitions for the city."
The delegation flew economy class on British Airways, and travelled in the three cities by coach. They met football and civic organisers, project teams, security experts and stadium designers.
"The important thing was to show Fifa and the FA that Plymouth are up for it," Mrs Pengelly said.
"They certainly know now that we want to be part of the bid.
"I would hate for Plymouth not to get it just because we thought it wasn't important enough.
"If we wanted Plymouth to be a small backwater town on the South Coast then fine, but if we want to be a vibrant European waterfront city then we had to do this."
Mrs Pengelly said they learned a number of valuable lessons about transport, security, cleaning staff — and even the number of toilets a city would need.
She said that in Cape Town Nike had sponsored two youth training centres with fitness suites.
She believed Plymouth could find a sponsor for similar facilities.
Mr Keel said his counterparts in South Africa had warned him of the need to be tough in negotiations with Fifa.
It is estimated that 3,700 jobs could be created in Plymouth if we host World Cup games in 2018, bringing in £292 million.
The bid is a regional one, backed by Devon and Cornwall which will host Fan Fests and training camps.








77 Comments
View all
by johnno, pennycomequick
Friday, June 25 2010, 12:12PM
“SID ANNING CROWNHILL is Keith Rossiter a press officer for Pengelly ?
i remember when he defended 3 Tory councillers when the vote was taken on the life centre .
these 3 didn't agree with this project , and instead of voting against it , they abstained from voting ,
keith rossiter said that they did the right thing ,
Pengelly and her sheep should be made to pay this money back ,”
by JD, Plymouth
Friday, June 25 2010, 9:36AM
“Absolutely disgraceful biased reporting from a growing tory loving media. And they went the day after they got rid of 45 temps in Childrens Services with no jobs to go to. These people are not fit to represent the majority of Plymouth!”
by CB, Plymouth
Friday, June 25 2010, 9:18AM
“I ahve to agree with Sid from Cornwall Keith Rossiter is certainly not a political reporter, he is Viv Pengelly's press officer. It couldn'y be more obvious if he had cheer leaders outfit on waving blue pom poms. (Sorry for the mental picture there everyone)”
by Jake, Plymouth
Friday, June 25 2010, 8:22AM
“Make yourselves heard, complain!
http://www.plymouth.gov.uk/councillorcomplaintform”
by SID ANNING, CROWNHILL
Friday, June 25 2010, 7:10AM
“What 'is it' with this Newspaper, and in particular Keith Rossiter whom appears to be joined at the hip with Vivien Pengelly, can see no wrong with this Tory administration that they have to leap to their defence at every juncture?
I am even more surprised however, that the Newspaper printed the leaked news in the first place. But I have noticed the paper have continued to justify this waste of public money.
We were led to believe that one of the reasons why Pengelly and Keel went to South Africa was because they felt that Plymouth should not be the only one NOT represented, and as it has turned out, five other City's failed to send representatives.
The facts are that these two highly paid wealthy individuals thought they could get away with it by doing it unannouced, but they have been caught with their fingers in the till.
I was under the impression that Political Writers like Keith Rossiter were supposed to be unbiased and simply printed the facts, but that's not the case and is so out of touch with reality that I wonder why this paper continues to pay him.
The vast majority of the correspondents on this page, and the public in general are AGAINST the two using public money to go to South Africa, So why does Keith continue to defend the indefensible?”
by Jake, Plymouth
Friday, June 25 2010, 6:56AM
“Will they be expecting to go to the next World Cup Final as well, or has a deal been done to allow a different set of councillors to have that jolly?
This sums up the World Cup exactly, it's full of under the table deals, jollies and pats on the back whilst we pay for something that "might" happen in 8 years time and another World Cup Final later!
All this to host 180 minutes of a sporting event!
If this is what it's all about then I for one am not the slightest bit interested in our city hosting the event so SHOVE THE WORLD CUP SOMEWHERE WHERE IT'S DARK!
It's a disgrace!”
by steve, plymouth
Friday, June 25 2010, 5:23AM
“Pengelly on £175000pa and she gets this freebie to 'research' for something that might happen??!!
A farce;im not from Plymouth and i can tell you this,the council here are appalling,they do this city no good,particularly the overpaid Pengelly.A city with such potential ruined and held back by a totally inept Council.”
by Hangman, Plymouth
Friday, June 25 2010, 4:03AM
“Peter, Mutley - I've study your comment and there's no doubt that you work for the Council or have some affliation with the Council. With the made up images on the article it looks a joke. I would like to see some official images of them with officials in South Africa learning the facts of hoisting a World Cup final - What a surprise, there aren't any!!”
by guzzman, weston mill
Thursday, June 24 2010, 11:49PM
“for goodness sake - show the game! get on with it. It smacks so much of double standards. bristol got so much media coverage on the national news, we are a joke!”
by jimbob, plymouth
Thursday, June 24 2010, 11:08PM
“@james, EGHD
have you seen the roadworks in plymouth over the past year?
do you know what is going on in gdynia way at the moment?
how can you make these comments when the facts are staring you in the face?
Come on, lets have some sense here.”