What has happened to our city leaders?
I AM not being facetious when I say this but just who is running this city because by all accounts it's not Plymouth City Council, but Sutton Harbour Holdings (SHH).
We are having one of the biggest debates in our lives about our airport in which more than 37,000 people signed a petition to say they want it kept. What do SHH do? They stick two fingers up by indicating they are going to do what they want to do and to hell with public opinion. That is just plain arrogance.
-

RIVAL PLANS: Two options are being put forward for the future of the airport site
I would say that SHH, the university and others seem to have far too much sway in what happens in this city and can only wonder how our councillors have allowed them to be put in a position where they can do virtually what they like with impunity.
Alison Seabeck and Tudor Evans must be worried about their political positions because they are squirming like stuck pigs at the moment over the airport and incinerator issues, and quite rightly so, as this is of their own making as they have failed in both cases and have sat back and done nothing. It's amazing how 37,000 possible votes focus the mind isn't it.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
What this city wants now is a real leader, someone who will stand up for the people of this city and do their bidding and not do what Tudor Evans or Vivien Pengelly have done and that is to simply ignore us and do what they want to do; it's time for a change. They have had their chances to do something positive for the airport and they have failed to get to grips with it. There should now be a referendum to elect a mayor who will stand up for Plymouth and take it forward. This city has suffered from the inadequacies of the past two councils and it's time for change.
After reading David Parlby's input on the airport, I think it's also time this city had a new man at the helm of the Plymouth Chamber of Commerce as he shows no real leadership and should not be at the forefront of any debate about our airport. His statement that "the Chamber agreed with the council that they should not put more public money into the airport", absolutely astounded me, and this is from the so-called business community. So what exactly does the Chamber of Commerce actually think we should be putting money into? Surely it's into something which allows business to flourish, helps inward investment and creates jobs and that's an airport.
BILL SNOW
Hartley




Comments
by FromMendip
Wednesday, September 12 2012, 11:20AM
“You have to be careful with what you wish for if an elected mayor is thought to be the panacea.
If it could be guaranteed that the person would be an independent-minded individual with no political party allegiance, with experience of successfully running a large organisation, a 'can do' attitude, a determination to ensure the city succeeds on every level and with leadership qualities then it might well work.
What would be more likely is a dreary list of potential mayors including a variety of independents, often one-issue gallopers, and the rest consisting of time-serving party hacks expected to follow the party line if elected.
Look no further than Bristol. After decades of inept local governance by all the main parties (at one time or another) - Plymouth seems to be a well-run city in comparison - a derisory number of voters turned out at the ballot box and by the tiniest majority decided that Bristol would have an elected mayor.
The mayoral election takes place in November and you wouldn't want any of the 20 or so
who have submiited their names (including all the political party nominees) or expressed an interest in standing to run the local jumble sale.”
by AnneTeak
Wednesday, September 12 2012, 10:33AM
“No comments allowed on airport story again confirming that SHH have the Herald and the Council in their pocket.
Only a matter of time before SHH build lots more houses on the land on which they only have a lease.
What a farce.”
by blogtodi
Wednesday, September 12 2012, 8:32AM
“So, let me get this right. The Chamber of Commerce and the council agree that the airport is a dead duck and no-one should invesst any money in it. And because of the agreement of these experts in business and management, Bill Snow thinks they are all prats...and, of course, all the pro-Viable punters are obvioulsy right.
Hmm...that takes a lot of thinking about. Bill, with that sort of article, you should have been a councillor (by your definition, that is).”
by PLYMFOX01
Wednesday, September 12 2012, 12:30AM
“An elected mayor is not a good idea. They elected one in Leicester who has just awarded himself a pay rise in excess of 70%, whilst public sector workers both within the council and elsewhere are either having a pay freeze, a pay cut or losing their jobs altogether. He has also sanctioned cuts to council services whilst receiving this huge pay rise. This is all by a man who is a member of the Labour party. (The mayor in Leicester earns around £100k per annum).”
by notolisbon
Tuesday, September 11 2012, 8:18PM
“@jennyplym
With the best possible respect to you, but I do not believe in this elected mayor idea - it is just an extension of the cabinet form of council rule.
It is alright electing a person into a position of power but what is to stop that person going off on his/her own power trip. Maybe a power of recall could ease this problem.
We have all witnessed Tudor Evans' anguish at not being allowed to have a say on the incinerator when he was excluded - the decisions made in this city must be made by as broad a spread of representation as possible - that means by the whole democratically elected council.
But you are correct on the sell off of the airport - we have seen so much of Plymouth being sold off to vested interests, including our council houses.
Drakes Island, Drakes Circus, Home Park (more shenanigans to come with Brent and a skating rink) Central Park - we are seeing our city sold off bit by bit.
It is searingly ironic when we hear so much about cohesive communities - our communities are being torn apart.”
by timplymouth
Tuesday, September 11 2012, 6:35PM
“What are you talking about? There wouldn't be a problem building new roads, they've already put in one new road:
http://tinyurl.com/c4zw5zw
The other road they would join onto the Morgan road roundabout.
I'm against their plans, but there would be no problem with roads. I also don't see how you think a Mayor would help.”
by jennyplym
Tuesday, September 11 2012, 5:49PM
“Well I know several people who have now asked under the Freedon of Information Act to find out who owns the Airport Land as it seems SHH do, who wrote the Lease and who gains form it also they have ALL asked to see the whole Lease. Commercially Sensitive does not apply now as SHH closed the Airport so it cannot be Commercially Sensitive.
We all know that it was the last Labour Administration who drew up the Lease what we all need is to know WHY if you do some simple research there is not anywhere another Lease like this anywhere.
By keep refusing the Herald and Private taxpayers sight of this Lease is begs the question why are they keeping it secret? Also I know from next month many people will be out collecting signatures in an effort to get 9.040 to trigger a referendum for an Elected Mayor that would take the power away from Elected Leader's such as Tudor Evans and Viv Pengelly a new Mayor will secure and safeguard the Airport site for future generations, you cannot build housing there unless you put in new roads etc, cost would be approx $300Million and would ahve to go through the Valley or above it on stilts Environmentalist would never allow it, we the people own all the property and land in Plymouth the Council are just the Custodians well they are supposed to be, time they realised it. The Council own nothing we all own it collectively.”
by timplymouth
Tuesday, September 11 2012, 5:08PM
“£90k sounds about right for those houses in North Prospect.”
by beowulfonline
Tuesday, September 11 2012, 4:37PM
“With the rancid bunch of councillors we've had for at least 25 years it's no wonder so few people vote in local elections these days.”
by trudie2010
Tuesday, September 11 2012, 4:19PM
“Someone who owned their home has been given a PCH house near me, maybe they didn't get any money, but a house instead.”